Jump to content

JimJim Orange County


Ocposterboy
This topic is 943 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

  • 1 year later...
  • Replies 76
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Interesting guy, very exotic looking. But don't hire him as a bottom. He agreed to bottom, and gets A for effort. But he's hardwired as a top. We had kind of a fun time sword-fighting and I enjoyed it just because he is an interesting guy, but...

 

The ad is expired at the moment.

 

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

I met him. Had a great time. His Ad seemed a little mysterious, wasn't actually sure what I would get when he answered the door. His private pictures on his RM profile seemed a little dated BUT in person, he was gorgeous from head to toe, the pictures didn't do him justice. Would definitely book again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see why you're suspicious. I've never thought that the reviews on Daddy's were a string of fabrications, but have been less trusting of reviews on RM unless the reviewer is established. But I suppose it's possible some made up reviews make their way onto Daddy's. Seems unlikely that many would. I don't know if Daddy does this, but my first review was in the Hooboy days and I was contacted by a moderator before the review was posted to verify I was for real and that I was the one who submitted the review. That was a practice with first time reviewers back then. Since I'm no longer a first time reviewer, I don't know if the practice has changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see why you're suspicious. I've never thought that the reviews on Daddy's were a string of fabrications, but have been less trusting of reviews on RM unless the reviewer is established. But I suppose it's possible some made up reviews make their way onto Daddy's. Seems unlikely that many would. I don't know if Daddy does this, but my first review was in the Hooboy days and I was contacted by a moderator before the review was posted to verify I was for real and that I was the one who submitted the review. That was a practice with first time reviewers back then. Since I'm no longer a first time reviewer, I don't know if the practice has changed.

 

Even in Hooboy's days, I think many of us were (and still are now since Daddy has taken over) suspicious when a provider has only, or mostly, 1st time reviewers. First time reviewers are not necessarily fake-obviously-but there are escorts who have had multiple reviews, all by first time reviewers. Sometimes having many 1st time reviewers could just be the luck of the draw. And the reviews are all real. But in other cases....

 

Jimjim seems to be a case of the former-i.e. he has mostly first time reviewers, but they've given a true description of him-although a bit inconsistent. I think one reviewer said he was versatile when all others say he is a top. And I think one reviewer may have indicated passionate kissing where others indicate dry. Also I think some talked about boyfriend experiences-whether they used those words or not. And while I've never had a boyfriend, if my boyfriend only gave me dry kisses, we wouldn't be boyfriends for very long.

 

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even in Hooboy's days, I think many of us were (and still are now since Daddy has taken over) suspicious when a provider has only, or mostly, 1st time reviewers. First time reviewers are not necessarily fake-obviously-but there are escorts who have had multiple reviews, all by first time reviewers. Sometimes having many 1st time reviewers could just be the luck of the draw. And the reviews are all real. But in other cases....

 

Jimjim seems to be a case of the former-i.e. he has mostly first time reviewers, but they've given a true description of him-although a bit inconsistent. I think one reviewer said he was versatile when all others say he is a top. And I think one reviewer may have indicated passionate kissing where others indicate dry. Also I think some talked about boyfriend experiences-whether they used those words or not. And while I've never had a boyfriend, if my boyfriend only gave me dry kisses, we wouldn't be boyfriends for very long.

 

Gman

 

What you see as inconsistency in the reviews, I see as diversity among the reviewers. We all have our own priorites. You've made yours very clear over and again. You focus on whether the escort is gay, whether he is a bottom/will bottom, and whether he wet-kisses. Others are less focused on one or more of those factors, and are quite satisfied with an escort who doesn't bottom, who doesn't kiss or dry-kisses, etc. I'll agree that more information is better, but chances are any review is going to reflect the reviewer's priorities and not go into things he didn't care about or do. So, the reviews can tell you some things, while others that are important to you/any potential client will best be gleaned from asking the escort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I talked to him a while back when he was actually contacting me here on the forum. If I remember it right, there are prior discussions about him and people participating in those discussions had quite different experiences with him, especially regarding whether he kisses or not. I indeed asked him about this forefront, and his response at the time was sort of ambiguous.... ("It depends....;" "If I think your personal hygiene is good..."). As someone who is confident in my own personal hygiene, the sort of subjective tone is his response made me hesitate and in the end I did not have the pleasure to meet with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What you see as inconsistency in the reviews, I see as diversity among the reviewers. We all have our own priorites. You've made yours very clear over and again. You focus on whether the escort is gay, whether he is a bottom/will bottom, and whether he wet-kisses. Others are less focused on one or more of those factors, and are quite satisfied with an escort who doesn't bottom, who doesn't kiss or dry-kisses, etc. I'll agree that more information is better, but chances are any review is going to reflect the reviewer's priorities and not go into things he didn't care about or do. So, the reviews can tell you some things, while others that are important to you/any potential client will best be gleaned from asking the escort.

You may be correct. However the best known escorts over the years have been known more for their consistencies. And where reports on their activities have differed, in most cases these have been due to -hmm how to put it-"expanded offerings" rather than restricting their activities with clients.

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even in Hooboy's days, I think many of us were (and still are now since Daddy has taken over) suspicious when a provider has only, or mostly, 1st time reviewers. First time reviewers are not necessarily fake-obviously-but there are escorts who have had multiple reviews, all by first time reviewers. Sometimes having many 1st time reviewers could just be the luck of the draw. And the reviews are all real. But in other cases....

 

Jimjim seems to be a case of the former-i.e. he has mostly first time reviewers, but they've given a true description of him-although a bit inconsistent. I think one reviewer said he was versatile when all others say he is a top. And I think one reviewer may have indicated passionate kissing where others indicate dry. Also I think some talked about boyfriend experiences-whether they used those words or not. And while I've never had a boyfriend, if my boyfriend only gave me dry kisses, we wouldn't be boyfriends for very long.

 

Gman

 

Story relayed to me about a dozen years ago:

As an escort was starting his career, he knew the importance of the Daddy's Reviews. He first made up two reviews for other well reviewed escorts basically following some of their existing reviews and echoing them. Then he did the first review on himself BUT, he was now a three time reviewer:):):) That self-written first review was amazing enough that I hired him and all his self-praise was true. Great way to start a career. He went on to be one of the most successful escorts ever; now retired and doing well in a new life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even in Hooboy's days, I think many of us were (and still are now since Daddy has taken over) suspicious when a provider has only, or mostly, 1st time reviewers. First time reviewers are not necessarily fake-obviously-but there are escorts who have had multiple reviews, all by first time reviewers. Sometimes having many 1st time reviewers could just be the luck of the draw. And the reviews are all real. But in other cases....

 

I agree with everything you said and would like to add the following:

  • If no experienced reviewer ever hired an escort whose reviewers were all first-time reviewers
  • Then the escort would never have a review from a multiple reviewer
  • And the cycle would continue
  • Therefore someone has to hire and review the escort so that he has at least one review from a multiple reviewer

Obviously, this is not a formal scientific/mathematical hypothesis (nor is the format correct) but it does make common sense, Or at least as much sense as the prevailing wisdom that one should be suspicious of an escort who has all first-time reviews.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with everything you said and would like to add the following:

  • If no experienced reviewer ever hired an escort whose reviewers were all first-time reviewers
  • Then the escort would never have a review from a multiple reviewer
  • And the cycle would continue
  • Therefore someone has to hire and review the escort so that he has at least one review from a multiple reviewer

Obviously, this is not a formal scientific/mathematical hypothesis (nor is the format correct) but it does make common sense, Or at least as much sense as the prevailing wisdom that one should be suspicious of an escort who has all first-time reviews.

 

Exactly so. If more experienced reviewers shy away from someone who has multiple "first" reviews, it'll be pretty tough for the escort to garner reviews except from first time reviewers. I'd also note that all we really can tell from the designation of "first review" is that the client hadn't submitted a review before then. Perhaps he has since, or perhaps he has hired many times but not submitted a review.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

I can confirm that he is even hotter in person than the pictures. He gave me the same advance line about personal hygiene in re: kissing -- I showed up literally having just brushed my teeth and otherwise clean too, but he said he didn't kiss "because of the virus."

 

I had also texted that I like to ease in slowly, not get undressed immediately, etc., but he either ignored all that or hadn't understood it. (His English in person was spotty both as spoken and in understanding me.)

 

So . . . mixed experience, I guess. Not sure I'd rebook unless I was feeling very eager and no other hot prospects were available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can confirm that he is even hotter in person than the pictures. He gave me the same advance line about personal hygiene in re: kissing -- I showed up literally having just brushed my teeth and otherwise clean too, but he said he didn't kiss "because of the virus."

 

I had also texted that I like to ease in slowly, not get undressed immediately, etc., but he either ignored all that or hadn't understood it. (His English in person was spotty both as spoken and in understanding me.)

 

So . . . mixed experience, I guess. Not sure I'd rebook unless I was feeling very eager and no other hot prospects were available.

 

Wow, thanks for the heads up! I was going to add him to my to do list and save him on my RM Buddy List. If his "English in person was spotty both as spoken and in understanding" where is he from originally? What's his background?

Edited by Danny-Darko
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can confirm that he is even hotter in person than the pictures. He gave me the same advance line about personal hygiene in re: kissing -- I showed up literally having just brushed my teeth and otherwise clean too, but he said he didn't kiss "because of the virus."

 

I had also texted that I like to ease in slowly, not get undressed immediately, etc., but he either ignored all that or hadn't understood it. (His English in person was spotty both as spoken and in understanding me.)

 

So . . . mixed experience, I guess. Not sure I'd rebook unless I was feeling very eager and no other hot prospects were available.

 

I've seen him twice. Didn't have the language issue though. Although the first time was just for massage, the 2nd time for more. I ultimately enjoyed both times.

Edited by tj_forplay
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen him twice. Didn't have the language issue though. Although the first time was just for massage, the 2nd time for more. I ultimately enjoyed both times, but the 2nd time I was expecting a bit more of an experience.

 

So you thought he was fluent in English?

 

Gman

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I contacted JimJim earlier today via text about a possible encounter in Indy next week. He was very quick to respond and his response was colloquial and friendly. Example: "I got a nice apt there (Indy) for the week. U can come to me then since I don't have a car." His rate was reasonable and I will likely meet up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you thought he was fluent in English?

 

Gman

Well we didn't really have deep conversations ?. He had an accent & now that I think about it, it would make sense that English isn't his first language. But there wasn't a communication problem. Tbh, how well he speaks English isn't on my radar when it comes to rating my experience with him. I think he's mediterranean or middle eastern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...