Skeptic and many aliases

[Guest Escort Protector]

I'm sick of his antics. I've been doing some digging and will soon reveal his real name and any other information. Maybe that will shut him up.

[Guest REGINA]

We all need protection and it's sweet that you've assumed this title, but I think that by threatening to expose someone, nice or evil, you're really sinking to his level.

 

I don't believe many of his histrionics are taken seriously, so, I think mum's-the-word is the best route to take. We all pretty much know the score on this one. It is always the wounded animal which bays the loudest; maybe a little more compassion is required.

 

You're sweet to be someone's hero though. We all need a hero now and then! :*

[Boston Guy]

I think that would be wrong (on moral, ethical and "netiquette" grounds), counterproductive and pretty much acting like a small child ("I don't like you, so I'm going to tell our parents [read "world"]).

 

One of the fundamental tenets of a board like this is the ability of people to partipate honestly but anonymously. Take away the anonymous portion, even by threat, and you'll lose many of the participants.

 

If Skeptic bothers you, don't read his posts. It's really exactly that simple.

[Guest bottomboykk]

I agree with the others. As much as I dislike Skeptic's inane posts, and as someone he has mocked here, I still don't think anyone would be served by revealing his identity. The vast majority of readers here know he's an idiot, and don't believe a word he says. Maybe the best thing would be for all of us to stop replying to anything he writes, and maybe he'll go away.

[Paul Revere]

I agree with the others, leave him alone. Actually Skeptic has been starting to make more positive contributions. I personally don't beleive that I need protection from Skeptic or any other posters.

 

If you don't like what he has to say, either ignore it, or respond. But otherwise, let him be. I don't recall anyone appointing you to be the Message Board police.

[HooBoy]

>I'm sick of his antics. I've

>been doing some digging and

>will soon reveal his real

>name and any other information.

>Maybe that will shut him

>up.

 

Please don't. I know who he is, but I would never publish anything more about him than I already have.

 

This is a fraternity that must rely on trust. As with any frathouse, there will be a prick or two. It's no big deal.

 

Please do not post any email addresses, real names, or anything that will violate the basic tenant of privacy here. I could have long ago cancelled his account and banned him forever, but I agree that sometimes we need to disagree.

 

HooBoy

[Will]

Skeptic

 

Please don't do that, EscortProtector. If you were to disregard someone's anonymity because you don't like what he says, you're acting like a self-appointed, not elected, vigillante. It's a form of outing that smacks of the self-righteousness and moral violence that the right-wingers use on us. If Skeptic's anonymity isn't respected here because of you, there's no reason why someone else should respect yours. HooBoy sets the rules here, and I think we should abide by them. You don't have to read what you don't want to read, although there is often real wisdom at the core of Skeptic's comments.

[Guest Shooter]

As much as I can't stand him and let him get way too far under my skin, please respect his right to expression and security in this forum. Yeah, I have made some nasty responses to his various aliases, but those were made in anger and frustration. Wish he had as much consideration and respect for others as they obviously do for him! Heck, this is probably another alias and he wants to test if we will jump to his 'aid and defense' as we do Billy or HooBoy!

 

Try to grin and move to the next post! Shooter

[Bilbo]

Having accidentily eavesdropped on my own eulogies once on this site myself, I am sure that when he finds this Skeptic will blush and perhaps cry. Then he will storm in here like Joan of Arc flaming us all for being so maudlin, even though he will agree we are correct.

It's too bad he's basically the only one of his kind as it would be just too delicious to have it pointed out that "this thread might have been started by the man himself." But I'm too much of a wimp to say that without attributing it (blaming it) on somebody else.

[Guest Escort Protector]

Alas, so I'll be a bit cryptic and not reveal all.Skeptic is Billy's ex

[Barry]

Try Again Escort Protector

 

I think not!

[Guest REGINA]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

What????

 

Is my leg being pulled...

 

Am I the only moron who didn't know this...

[Barry]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

REG,

 

Escort Protector...whoever the hell he is, is pulling ALL of you legs.

 

I'm not Skeppy nor am I any of his other aliases. Since Hoo knows who I am and I think he knows whos Skeptic is, I would suggest asking him if you think this full fledged festering fecal food has any validity.

 

Always, Barry :-)

[Guest REGINA]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

LAST EDITED ON Apr-10-00 AT 01:19PM (CST)[p]LAST EDITED ON Apr-10-00 AT 01:14 PM (CST)

 

If I'm getting too personal feel free to mind my own business but I'm just curious about escort relationships. Did you find his work getting in the way of your life together? How did you meet? Are you an escort too? I've never really had the opportunity to ask someone this and chances are I'll never get the opportunity again so...

 

I really don't mean to cramp your style nor infringe upon your own personal life. I'm just curious if and how a personal relationship works with an escort. Again, if I'm out of line I'm sorry and feel free to tell me so...if not you I'm sure some other skeptical beings will put me in my place.

 

Any other escorts who have insight into this question are welcome to respond as well.

 

Thanks Barry, any posting would be appreciated.

 

p.s. Nice alliteration!

 

 

OOOOOPS!!!

 

I just re-read your posting on the other topic. Please ignore my request for information. I respect your request for privacy and had I taken the time to remember what I've actually read, would not have listed these questions. Again, my apologies.

[Guest bunglepok]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

Hey Regina:

 

The great love of my life was, like me, an escort. We also knew another escort couple.

 

In my opinion, escorts who are boyfriends share an intimacy that escorts don't achieve with clients. The couple understands that encounters with clients is acting while encounters with each other is genuine. More importantly, a good boyfriend accepts one as is, even if both are escorts.

 

Of course, an advantage of having an escort as a boyfriend is that he's a pro in the sack.

[Guest REGINA]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

Bungle,

 

Thanks for the response. You saw the great love of your life WAS with another escort. Without going into too much detail, was the reason of your seperation due to work or other reasons?

 

I would indeed think that relationships between escorts would be more successful than with us mere mortals as you would truly understand the nature of the work.

 

As far as being great in the sack, well, all I can say is--althought practice does make perfect--some things just come naturally! :-)

[Bilbo]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

Mary Regina, I simply cannot allow that one to pass unnoted, not on this site! Good sex may be instinctual, but great sex is not. If you don't believe, try to remember the last time you had an early twenties near virgin just coming out of the closet. Unless you were one yourself, you were probably bored nearly shitless. Unless you are one of those people who enjoys teaching youngsters how to do things. Which proves my point, too. Now contrast it with a nearly 40s, not so gym bod who Really Knows what he's doing! Which one would you rather bed, dear?

BTW, my honey and I were in business together too, but since we're not anymore and since we still don't live together under one roof, I will sit back and hope that others make more interesting answers than I might.

[Traveller]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

As a general SOP, I'll take 20s, ripped gym bod, no wrinkles, hard 24 hours a day and comparable to the proverbial post. But then again, what else would you expect from me. We all have are MOs. BTW, a certain Michael (aka Reese) from Stellas was awful fun last Sat. night. Drop dead grogeous and very nice. I'd review him, but he left nothing but polaroids. Have fun boys.

[Bilbo]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

Yes, but Traveller, I said a near virginal - I doubt if you go around hiring virgins. Whereas the escorts have plenty of experience with them, believe me.

[Barry]

RE:Escort Relationships

 

REGINA

 

While to some very private, it is an interesting topic. You might want to bring it up again under it's own thread. There's way too much baggage on this one.

 

I would certainly add to it repectfully without crossing the line of private matters.

[Guest bunglepok]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

Regina, the escort business did not cause the breakup of my ex and I. Gay relationships between twenty-somethings tend to be volatile. In our case we were addicted to each other but somehow drifted apart anyway after 4 years. Love is irrational.

 

Bilbo, I don't know why but I almost always find virgins to be more satisfying than experienced guys. That's regardless of age. They're easy to train. I get a headache if I don't have a virgin once in awhile. ;-)

[HooBoy]

RE:Escort Relationships

 

>REGINA

>

>While to some very private, it

>is an interesting topic.

>You might want to bring

>it up again under it's

>own thread. There's way

>too much baggage on this

>one.

>

>I would certainly add to it

>repectfully without crossing the line

>of private matters.

 

We have a chat night coming with Rick Munroe and Derek from NYC. They are lovers and highly rated escorts. Rick is also one of the funniest people I have come across. I have never met him, but his emails to me make me laugh.

 

As has been noted here by my friend Barry, I have no clue what the time is anywhere in the world, much less in mine. :-) I actually encouraged him to post that message after he emailed and teased me.

 

Rick Munroe wrote me something very confusing about what night the chat was and I'm sure somewhere it's all figured out.

 

I am on vacation right now, but unless I'm online in an airplane to annoy Skeptic, I want to be online with these hot, smart, guys . I think the dynamics of the Rick/Derek relationship must be really interesting and Rick and Derek have agreed to let us snoop.

 

I had dinner last night with a top escort who has a lover - no sex - just dinner, because we have become friends and probably won't have sex anymore because he feels funny about taking money from me and I won't have sex with him and not pay. I respect his work and I appreciate that he has a lover and if I became involved with him as a friend, it would violate the vow that he has exchanged with his lover. And what kind of friend would I be?

 

But the thing that he discussed to a great degree is that having sex with a client is much different than having sex with the man you love.

 

From someone who has had very few "lovers", most encounters with escorts leave me VERY depressed.

 

HooBoy

[Bilbo]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

Bungle, I don't know if you will have heard of Ray Hill. He is a long time campaigner for sexual rights - usually gay people's but not necessarily. He also watches out over prisoners and has a prison oriented show on the public radio here in Houston. He has done some good on the national level, so, maybe something about him has caught your eye.

Anyway, his sainted mother always said that one should change one's man every five years.

I know that I was in my forties before I ever had one for more than two. And it wasn't the escorting because I stopped it while I was with husbands 2 - 4. Although maybe indirectly as per the kinds of people who love this life - usually, I would think, ones who love open relationships and variety, too.

[Guest REGINA]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

Dear Bilbo,

 

I certainly didn't mean to imply that younger partners were better than older, quite the contrary. I ALWAYS have and ALWAYS will be attracted to older men, but that's because I don't have a good relationship with my father and I'm still looking for approval and love (and not incestual), but also I'm pretty fucked in the head but I digress...

 

Anyway, my point was to NOT confuse experience with passion. I know I'm not the best fuck in the world, quite the contrary, I think I'm pretty uncoordinated, BUT I have a lot of passion about sex: I love to kiss and lick and bite and touch and sweat and just jump into with with both feet, as it were. I have to have a vocal partner, silent sex just doesn't do it for me, unless I'm in a book store...something which just doesn't exist here in NYC (thank you Mayor Turd). I don't have a trick pelvis or a big dick (but I am limber...), I'm not the most beautiful or stunning person (I've been told I'm "perky") but I'm always looking forward to tomorrow; and whenever I'm with someone, whether it be five minutes or five hours, I truly believe I am totally in love (I told you I was fucked in the head).

 

Anyway, that's a long winded way of saying that without passion, experience is just a lot of time spent in an exercise.

 

BUNGLE, yes, love is irrational...love is unpredictable, love makes me cry, love makes me laugh, love makes my toes curl, love needs love and I miss being in love.

 

Isn't love swell?!?!

 

Thanks for responding to my question. :-)

[Guest paulnyc]

RE: Skeptic is Billy's Ex?

 

who even cares? This is so silly.