Jump to content

Backpage, as usual, to good to be true?


Johnny_85
This topic is 2299 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

 

I’m certain this ad or someone using the same pics has been talked about on the forum before. The guy pictured in the ad is a male model based out of New York. I’m not saying the model isn’t escorting, but I’d be skeptical of the ad.

 

To be fair though, the model guy has nude photos online in webcam type situations/settings. He also has an onlyfans page. So it’s maybe within the realm of possibility the real guy can be hired. Looking the way he does, I’m sure he isn’t a cheap hire... if he is hireable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I’m certain this ad or someone using the same pics has been talked about on the forum before. The guy pictured in the ad is a male model based out of New York. I’m not saying the model isn’t escorting, but I’d be skeptical of the ad.

 

To be fair though, the model guy has nude photos online in webcam type situations/settings. He also has an onlyfans page. So it’s maybe within the realm of possibility the real guy can be hired. Looking the way he does, I’m sure he isn’t a cheap hire... if he is hireable.

 

My rule of thumb when an image search matches someone else on the internet: If a single picture on the escort's ad matches someone else on the internet, I don't automatically assume it's a stolen picture. That "someone else" just might be escorting. If every (or most) pictures on the escort's ad can be found elsewhere on the internet, especially on social media type sites (twitter, instagram, tumblr, etc), then it's a pretty sure thing that the ad is using stolen pictures and I bypass that escort.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...