Jump to content

Barebacking, Yet Again


Guest 2004
This topic is 6802 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Down in the gutter with the other children

 

>

>You would call it that because you are blinded by your hatred

>of anyone who says anything you disagree with. It could

>hardly be more obvious.

 

I call it that because that's what it is. There is nothing wrong with my vision, and you don't know me at all, so your characterization of me having hatred for anyone is way off base.

 

, you hypocrite.

 

Ouch. that hurt }(

 

I've been following

>this board since long before you showed up.

 

Interesting, our participation dates are only 32 days apart. Is that what constitutes a long time to you? Re-reading some of your more bitchy posts, I can understand why that seems like a long time to you. I am sure you are not going to claim you know when I started following this board are you?

 

Woodlawn, it's not that I am against you or anyone else expressing an opinion, as I have stated many times before. But the fact that you and others often post only when you can criticize or ridicule others (as in your statement that BoN's question and answer was more beneficial). My response called to question that you (thank God)_ are NOT the arbiter of what is useful here anymore than I am.

It's not that you aren't or can't be constructive or even civil. It's your apparent distaste for it and the need to ridicule everyone you consider beneath you. Tell me you are going to deny that.

 

So while we both may think we are superior, when someone else comes on here to ask a question that they are interested in, you must find a way to belittle that person because you feel their question is useless, (dumb, ignorant, incredibly stupid...etc ad nauseum) Does this give you some kind of validation as a human being? If you were able to couch your spew in satire or even wit, maybe I could appreciate it more. Please try that for a while and see if it can work. But as it is, it just seems like so much bitchy, Queenie smack. You and your friends Nick and the former hustler/porn studio owner known as Doug should try butching up for a while .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

RE: Down in the gutter with the other children

 

>Woodlawn, it's not that I am against you or anyone else

>expressing an opinion, as I have stated many times before.

>But the fact that you and others often post only when you can

>criticize or ridicule others (as in your statement that BoN's

>question and answer was more beneficial).

 

As I pointed out in my other post in this thread, you are simply doing here what so many people do here all the time: accuse those who disagree with you or express opinions that you dislike of being mean, mocking, critical, etc. etc. - all as a means to try to coerce people to only say the things you like.

 

The fact of the matter is, as I demonstrated, Woodlawn, BoN and I all posted comments which were directly responsive to the original poster, and did so in a manner which did not even remotely incorporate any personal attacks or anything similar.

 

But because it did not promote the harmonious, communal hand-wringing which the original poster engaged in and wanted to induce others to engage in, now you and a little group of intolerants want to claim that our points were somehow off-topic, and therefore designed only to disrupt, ridicule, etc.

 

If you don't like a point that someone makes here, then rebut it. Don't run around lying that the point is irrelevant to the topic at hand and is therefore guilty of being unduly critical and mocking.

 

As usual, the pleas for increased niceness and a sense of "community" are nothing more than thinly disguised weapons used to try to intimidate and attack anyone who dissents from the prevailing view here. For whatever reasons, this thread - just like the one started by that married guy who cheats on his wife - enables this malignant scheme to be seen more visibly and clearly than usual.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Down in the gutter with the other children

 

>

>As usual, the pleas for increased niceness and a sense of

>"community" are nothing more than thinly disguised weapons

>used to try to intimidate and attack anyone who dissents from

>the prevailing view here.

 

Huh?

 

You are moaning about people attacking others? If there is a prevailing view here, it's not very apparent. Posters and views are all over the map, and no one seems to be getting booted for saying anything they want.

 

As I said, Butch up a bit will ya?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Down in the gutter with the other children

 

I suppose "butching" it "up" is posting in all bold letters? Someone who feels the need to post in all caps or all bold is betraying a deep seated insecurity. It's akin to what you find on Fox "News", especially lately regarding Cindy Sheehan. Since you can't dispute the content of what is being said, you resort to attacking the poster and "shouting" (ie bold letters) over him.

 

It is further compounded by the disdain that you and the other Church Ladies have expressed about us "mean girls". Yet, you turn around and engage in exactly the same behavior which you claim to find abhorrent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Down in the gutter with the other children

 

>>

>>As usual, the pleas for increased niceness and a sense of

>>"community" are nothing more than thinly disguised weapons

>>used to try to intimidate and attack anyone who dissents

>from

>>the prevailing view here.

 

>You are moaning about people attacking others?

 

No. What he's complaining about is the hypocrisy displayed by you and the other "Church Ladies" who complain about personal attacks from one side of your mouths and indulge in personal attacks from the other side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Down in the gutter with the other children

 

>I call it that because that's what it is.

 

In your opinion. You share with several other posters here a penchant for stating personal opinions as though they were irrefutable facts. They are not.

 

> There is nothing

>wrong with my vision, and you don't know me at all, so your

>characterization of me having hatred for anyone is way off

>base.

 

I know you only as you have described yourself, which is something you've done at great length on this message board. If you're going to write page after page here talking about yourself, don't complain if people form opinions about you based on what you've written. And if those opinions are inaccurate, then the fault is yours, not ours.

 

> I've been following

>>this board since long before you showed up.

>

>Interesting, our participation dates are only 32 days

>apart. Is that what constitutes a long time to you?

 

I said "following," not "posting." You do understand that those two words are not synonyms, don't you?

 

> I am sure you are not

>going to claim you know when I started following this board

>are you?

 

I claim to know when you began posting. I have no trouble remembering the many long, lugubrious posts you penned in those days describing your battle with depression. How's that going, by the way? :)

 

 

>But the fact that you and others often post only when you can

>criticize or ridicule others (as in your statement that BoN's

>question and answer was more beneficial).

 

 

Please don't lie. I stated only that the question asked by the thread author doesn't make a great deal of sense since there is no real answer to it. And that knowing the answer is of no practical benefit to clients. I still don't see anything from you (or anyone else) to refute that. And I don't see how those statements can possibly be construed as a personal attack, since they say absolutely nothing about the person who asked the question. That is the line that Hooboy repeatedly urged all of us not to cross, and unlike you I did not cross it in those comments.

 

> It's your apparent distaste for it and the need to

>ridicule everyone you consider beneath you. Tell me you are

>going to deny that.

 

I do tell you. See above.

 

>So while we both may think we are superior, when someone else

>comes on here to ask a question that they are interested in,

>you must find a way to belittle that person because you feel

>their question is useless, (dumb, ignorant, incredibly

>stupid...etc ad nauseum) Does this give you some kind of

>validation as a human being?

 

Again, you are lying. What I said about the thread author's question can in no way be construed as a comment on the thread author as a person. Both Hooboy and Daddy have repeatedly asked members to feel free to say what they like about what others post, but to refrain from commenting on what others ARE. My comments here have followed that rule. Yours have not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Down in the gutter with the other children

 

>I suppose "butching" it "up" is posting in all bold letters?

 

I should have realized you would not know what Butch is. Sorry for giving you too much credit

 

 

>Someone who feels the need to post in all caps or all bold is

>betraying a deep seated insecurity.

 

Wrong again, oh great one. I am fully secure with who I am. I am not the one has let an obsessive compulsion regarding one escort define who I am and even give me me an online name.

The caps are to differentiate between your post and mine. Not that the inherent strength of my post isn't already enough

 

 

 

 

> Since you can't dispute the content of what is being said,

>you resort to attacking the poster and "shouting" (ie bold

>letters) over him.

 

I do dispute and I only give back back what I get

>

Yet, you

>turn around and engage in exactly the same behavior which you

>claim to find abhorrent.

 

I guess maybe it's a case of if you can't beat 'em , join 'em. You got room in your club?:+

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Down in the gutter with the other children

 

>In your opinion. You share with several other posters here a

>penchant for stating personal opinions as though they were

>irrefutable facts. They are not.

 

agreed, nor are yours

 

And if those opinions are

>inaccurate, then the fault is yours, not ours.

you wish..

 

>

>> I've been following

>>>this board since long before you showed up.

 

and you know this how? Is this one of YOUR irrefutable facts?

>>

>>Interesting, our participation dates are only 32 days

>>apart. Is that what constitutes a long time to you?

>

>I said "following," not "posting." You do understand that

>those two words are not synonyms, don't you?

 

if you had read my post you would see that is what I was saying. The lurking date isn't the same as the posting start date, but you have no idea how long I followed this MC anymore than I have of your start. SO?

 

. I have no trouble

>remembering the many long, lugubrious posts you penned in

>those days describing your battle with depression. How's that

>going, by the way? :)

 

It went just fine, thanks for asking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Down in the gutter with the other children

 

>>In your opinion. You share with several other posters here

>a penchant for stating personal opinions as though they were

>>irrefutable facts. They are not.

>

>agreed, nor are yours

 

I didn't state my opinions as anything other than opinions. You did.

 

> And if those opinions are

>>inaccurate, then the fault is yours, not ours.

 

>you wish..

>

 

You can hardly blame other members for getting an inaccurate opinion of you if our opinion is based on your own descriptions of yourself. Although I am sure you would like to blame us, it makes absolutely no sense to do so.

 

>>> I've been following

>>>>this board since long before you showed up.

 

> if you had read my post you would see that is what I was

>saying. The lurking date isn't the same as the posting start

>date, but you have no idea how long I followed this MC anymore

>than I have of your start. SO?

 

Again, you have trouble reading English. I said "before you showed up." The only way any poster can "show up" on this board is by posting, since lurking leaves no trace discernible by other posters. Again, I have been following this board since long before you showed up. What part of that sentence do you NOT understand?

 

And no matter when I began following this board, is there any reason why I should do anything other than laugh derisively when you presume to imply that this board is somehow more YOURS than mine, as you did above?

 

 

> I have no trouble

>>remembering the many long, lugubrious posts you penned in

>>those days describing your battle with depression. How's

>that going, by the way? :)

>

>It went just fine, thanks for asking

 

 

Good luck with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RE: Down in the gutter with the other children

 

> Wrong again, oh great one. I am fully secure with who I

>am. I am not the one has let an obsessive compulsion regarding

>one escort define who I am and even give me me an online

>name.

>The caps are to differentiate between your post and mine. Not

>that the inherent strength of my post isn't already

>enough

 

Once again, in typical Church Lady fashion you give a textbook example of my point: since you have no salient arguement, you resort to attacking me and how I cam to choose this name. This has been done time and time again and it is no more relevant now than when the first idiot tried to use it against me years ago.

 

I knew you would come up with a good rationalization for your use of bold lettering, but it still doesn't change the inarguable fact that it is about your insecurities and your inability to effectively dispute those who point out your lies and misinformation.

 

> Yet, you

>>turn around and engage in exactly the same behavior which

>you

>>claim to find abhorrent.

>

> I guess maybe it's a case of if you can't beat 'em , join

>'em. You got room in your club?:+

 

You're certainly mean enough to join, but sadly you could not pass the IQ test.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...