411 MatthewRipped

[ross06]

Please tell me he isn't a fake ----

 

http://www.men4rentnow.com/gay/escort/male/massage/miami_beach/matthewripped93/313805

[dutchal]

Is also on masseurfinder: http://www.masseurfinder.com/members/matthewripped93.shtml

[ross06]

He IS beautiful

[unsure]

A reverse search didn't come up with those pictures anywhere else except on those ads.

[+ Gar1eth]

He IS beautiful

 

He is straight.

 

Gman

[ross06]

He is straight.

 

Gman

 

But STILL beautiful (if he is real) -- lol

[+ Gar1eth]

He is straight.

 

Gman

 

But STILL beautiful (if he is real) -- lol

 

Some of my best friends are straight. But I have no desire to have sex with them-well maybe a few. :pBut not with them topping

 

Gman

[mike carey]

Chacun à son goût.

[+ Gar1eth]

Chacun à son goût.

 

Or to say it more plainly....

 

De gustibus non est disputandum.

 

 

It is interesting because it seems to me people ask more about top escorts in general or if not ask about them, more guys who like to bottom chime in than when versatile or bottom escorts are mentioned. Maybe it's not true-and I forget the comparable outpouring of comments people make for versatile or bottom guys.

 

But back when we could do surveys, I did one on how you classify yourself-top/bottom/versatile. The survey wasn't representative of the Forum because not that many people took it. But of the ones who did, there was a clear majority for when you summed the top and versatile categories. So they leads to the questions-Did a majority of the Bottom Forum Members just decide not to take the poll? Are the Bottom (in position only not in 'class status') Forum Members more likely to ask about Top (position) escorts more often than Top or Versatile Members will ask about Versatile/Bottom escorts? Do Bottom FMs (Forum Members ) like straight escorts more than Top FMs, or is it just that straight escorts advertise as Tops more often.

 

Lots of interesting questions.

 

Gman

[MrMiniver]

It's interesting that he describes his body type as "athletic" when he's obviously ripped as can be in his pics. Too bad he's straight, he's hot as hell.

[MrMiniver]

And he's straight but "open to a Long Term Relationship?" Very strange ad.

[mike carey]

And he's straight but "open to a Long Term Relationship?" Very strange ad.

I'm sure he is open to an LTR, with a woman!

[+ Gar1eth]

It's interesting that he describes his body type as "athletic" when he's obviously ripped as can be in his pics. Too bad he's straight, he's hot as hell.

 

That's actually one of my red flags for a scam. I've noticed often there is s discrepancy between the pictures and physical description. But maybe he's just modest.

 

Gman

[Nvr2Thick]

It's interesting that he describes his body type as "athletic" when he's obviously ripped as can be in his pics. Too bad he's straight, he's hot as hell.

 

That's actually one of my red flags for a scam. I've noticed often there is s discrepancy between the pictures and physical description. But maybe he's just modest.

 

Gman

 

The choices on M4RN are:

 

Athletic Build

Average Build

Few Extra Pounds

Muscular/Buff

Thin/Lean

 

I don't think that a ripped guy checking the "Athletic Build" box instead of "Muscular/Buff" is really misrepresenting himself.

 

And he's straight but "open to a Long Term Relationship?" Very strange ad.

 

Seems to me that when this category was added to M4RN profiles everyone was showing up as "yes". I wonder if that was the default for existing profiles. I wonder how many escorts know that the category is there.

[MrMiniver]

That's actually one of my red flags for a scam. I've noticed often there is s discrepancy between the pictures and physical description. But maybe he's just modest.

 

Gman

 

I always notice that as well. I often wonder why guys who are posting fake ads can't even get the height/weight/body type thing right. Half of the fakes post pics of big ripped guys and then list themselves as "slim" "5'11" 150 lbs. Not realizing it is impossible to be big and ripped at that size.

[MrMiniver]

The choices on M4RN are:

 

Athletic Build

Average Build

Few Extra Pounds

Muscular/Buff

Thin/Lean

 

I don't think that a ripped guy checking the "Athletic Build" box instead of "Muscular/Buff" is really misrepresenting himself.

 

 

 

Seems to me that when this category was added to M4RN profiles everyone was showing up as "yes". I wonder if that was the default for existing profiles. I wonder how many escorts know that the category is there.

 

To me, an "athletic build" (when muscular is a choice) is one in which you look like an athlete but don't have much muscular definition. So, by that standard, the guy's choice is misrepresentation at best.

[ross06]

Well I decided to stay away -- Thanks for all your input

[LouieD]

Bumping this... anyone have any experience with him?

He sure is handsome. I don't care if he's straight as long as his ad is legit.

[lokki]

I e-mailed him (only choice I could see) last weekend. No response.

[quaero]

I've chatted and texted with him before and he sent me photo-dated pics (i.e. proof and most recent) of himself. Pretty sure he's legit.

[Highlander]

I am new to the Forum. I live in Miami and have seen MatthewRipped's ad and would like to hook up. How do you know the pics are his? Idk what photo-dating means.

May I ask why you haven't hired him?

[+ Charlie]

And he's straight but "open to a Long Term Relationship?" Very strange ad.

That probably means he wants to be a kept boy. Straight guys often prefer that.