Jump to content

Yesterday's Review of West Coast Mike


Just Sayin
This topic is 3726 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Just to be clear, I wasn't disturbed that the reviewer included that information. I'm glad he did! I'm disturbed by what happened. Regardless of what one thinks about safe sex, I hope we can all agree that both (or all) partners in sexual intercourse should be in agreement on what is happening during sex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to be clear, I wasn't disturbed that the reviewer included that information. I'm glad he did! I'm disturbed by what happened. Regardless of what one thinks about safe sex, I hope we can all agree that both (or all) partners in sexual intercourse should be in agreement on what is happening during sex.

 

EXACTLY - There are escorts out there advertising heavily (even on these forum pages) who, for instance not only freely take drugs and are very much into PNP -- but then do not even answer or mark the question in Rentboy on "Drugs" -- so they cannot be accused of lying. Same with Safe Sex -- they just leave that box empty and "caveat emptor" when you hire them. You discover it - almost at the last second in some cases - in the midst of a hire.

 

I am wary of the escorts du jours who suddenly appear here, and then when you pull up their ads, it is more what is unsaid that I find interesting. I generally do advanced searches where I mark down all my red flag items, and minimal expectations (this is where Rentboy is so piss poor -- no idea if the guy has tats and piercing [aside from partial photos that can be admittedly photo-shopped as is heavily down by a Philly escort agency]. You'd think they could add an extra category on this???).

 

If I see the info on drugs is blank or worse, MISSING I assume the escort is into drugs and PNP. I have had too many bad experiences in the past giving a guy a "pass" and only to have a zonked out but muscled body god come into the room, and remain flaccid, and dangerously out-of-it for too long into the encounter. (And sadly, many who freely use drugs and PNP often are a bit too careless when it comes to condom use, "forgetting" to bring them along. Another sign is when they arrived super hyped up, and ask to use your computer to cruise other escorts in the area for a 3-way or more-way... I now have my computer firmly put away when a guy arrives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few minutes ago, I came to this thread and the various posts following it. My interests piqued: I went and read the review and thought: did the reviewer watch Mike as he was supposedly 'suiting up!' Where were his eyes? Where was his attention? Even if one is on his knees being fucked, it does take a slight moment to witness a "glove" being put on!

 

Damn! If I'm being fucked, I always have condoms awaiting the man who's going to do "the deed!" [Have never had a problem.] If he, the escort, does NOT desire to wear a condom, then he doesn't get to plow me either! Again, as others have alluded-- everything should be discussed up front! Also, and lastly, the 'bottom'/client should NOT have let Mike fuck him without seeing that sheath being put onto a 'gorgeous cock' before sliding into a tight crevice!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm disturbed by the rather cavalier attitude of the reviewer. I'd be OUTRAGED if someone barebacked me without asking. I didn't sense that from the review. But then I always watch the condom go on, and helping can even be fun!

 

Exactly, that's called common sense. I always watch it, maybe Mike West Coast felt he wasn't going to be able to keep it hard with that client and that's why he decided not to wear a condom... who knows, but it's unacceptable!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On the contrary I was glad to see it. When I was with WCM he complained that he didn't like condoms and I had a strong feeling he didn't want to use them based on certain behavior ...

 

What do you mean by "based on certain behavior"? Do you mean that this isn't a single accident but rather becoming a pattern?

 

I don't believe the "Trade Union" would condone the behavior of willfully exposing a client to STDs and possibly HIV by fucking him unsafely without his knowledge. WTF??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EXACTLY - There are escorts out there advertising heavily (even on these forum pages) who, for instance not only freely take drugs and are very much into PNP -- but then do not even answer or mark the question in Rentboy on "Drugs" -- so they cannot be accused of lying. Same with Safe Sex -- they just leave that box empty and "caveat emptor" when you hire them. You discover it - almost at the last second in some cases - in the midst of a hire.

 

I am wary of the escorts du jours who suddenly appear here, and then when you pull up their ads, it is more what is unsaid that I find interesting. I generally do advanced searches where I mark down all my red flag items, and minimal expectations (this is where Rentboy is so piss poor -- no idea if the guy has tats and piercing [aside from partial photos that can be admittedly photo-shopped as is heavily down by a Philly escort agency]. You'd think they could add an extra category on this???).

 

If I see the info on drugs is blank or worse, MISSING I assume the escort is into drugs and PNP. I have had too many bad experiences in the past giving a guy a "pass" and only to have a zonked out but muscled body god come into the room, and remain flaccid, and dangerously out-of-it for too long into the encounter. (And sadly, many who freely use drugs and PNP often are a bit too careless when it comes to condom use, "forgetting" to bring them along. Another sign is when they arrived super hyped up, and ask to use your computer to cruise other escorts in the area for a 3-way or more-way... I now have my computer firmly put away when a guy arrives.

 

And some (and NOT ALL) well reviewed escorts here claim "safe® sex only" and totally rather bareback... ok, open a can of "S" storm, let it roll....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...