Jump to content

Today's review of Reese - NYC


uwsman2
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think the first-time reviewer didn't understand how to fill out the form. He filled in "No" for anal and oral, but then clicking on Reese's rentboy ad, he lists both of those as things that he does. The reviewer seemed to be hiring him mainly for muscle worship and wrestling, and evidently interpreted the form to indicate what the client did with the escort, rather than what the escort will do.

 

Reese sounds fantastic! But it would be interesting to know whether his ad accurately describes what he does.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the reviewer appropriately answered the questions based on his experience. How can he report on something he didn't experience. In my opinion, answering the questions any other way would be misleading. Perhaps N/A would have been a more appropriate response, but I haven't written a review in over 5 years so I don't remember if that is an option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I think the first-time reviewer didn't understand how to fill out the form."

 

I feel your criticism is invalid. Some years ago when I was hiring, and young men wanted published reviews, I filed numerous reviews; I always detailed SPECIFICALLY what I DID with the escort and how he performed. From my viewpoint, it's very helpful to read in a review what an escort DID with a fit, older client. What the escort MAY do with others can easily be determined by consulting the escort's ad or sending him a polite email.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to agree that the review appears appropriate for the experience the client had. Although his interests are definitely not mine that is irrelevant as he is writing about his own experience. Based on this review if I were in New York I would certainly consider contacting Reese to determine if we were a fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the others: The reviewer filled out the form based on his own experience, which is appropriate, expected, and accurate. The review form contains help text for each field. The help text for oral states "Please select his oral preferences if appropriate and known." In this case, the reviewer didn't know because he didn't hire the escort for that activity. However, there is a "N/A" selection in the drop-down list, which is what I would probably have chosen if I had engaged in a session of this type.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you guys are missing my point. The text section is where you relate what you did with the escort. When I read the review, I assumed that the escort was available only for muscle worship, wrestling, etc., because the reviewer listed No for anal or oral. I think if the reviewer wasn't interested in anal or oral and never discussed those activities with the escort, the correct way to fill out the form is to select N/A on the drop box.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with the others: The reviewer filled out the form based on his own experience, which is appropriate, expected, and accurate. The review form contains help text for each field. The help text for oral states "Please select his oral preferences if appropriate and known." In this case, the reviewer didn't know because he didn't hire the escort for that activity. However, there is a "N/A" selection in the drop-down list, which is what I would probably have chosen if I had engaged in a session of this type.

 

The directions for the "his activites' are as follows:

 

This section contains the 'Activities' if appropriate for the review.

 

The information should be as he advertises it because each client's mileage may vary
.

 

These fields are all optional but are nice to know.

 

I read that as saying, list what his ad says. The 'Session information' section is the place for describing what he actually did with the client.

 

I'm well aware, however, that many reviewers don't adhere to those directions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...
  • 9 months later...

Reviews #9 and #10 appear to be exactly the same - word for word. Both reviews published a few days apart with the latest one published on March 10. Is this an oversight maybe? It doesn't help the credibility of the escort, nor of the reviewer, if it isn't.

 

It seems his RB ad is down anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reviews #9 and #10 appear to be exactly the same - word for word. Both reviews published a few days apart with the latest one published on March 10. Is this an oversight maybe? It doesn't help the credibility of the escort, nor of the reviewer, if it isn't.

 

It seems his RB ad is down anyway.

 

My take on it, is that it was an administrative error or possibly a correction of sorts. The original review that ran onThurs March 6th listed his locale as "World" when it is in fact "NYC" which is now listed on the Tues March 10th review. I don't think anyone would be crazy (stupid) enough to try submitting the same review within days of each other and not think it wouldn't be noticed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I've met Reese a few times. He's very nice. Very muscled! He has never let me take his shorts off though. I don't care that much. It's just funny that he talks about how hung he is. I've met him three times. I have never cum with him. lol. Again. I don't care that much. He's a stud. Anyone know other guys his size?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...