Today's review of Reese - NYC

[uwsman2]

I think the first-time reviewer didn't understand how to fill out the form. He filled in "No" for anal and oral, but then clicking on Reese's rentboy ad, he lists both of those as things that he does. The reviewer seemed to be hiring him mainly for muscle worship and wrestling, and evidently interpreted the form to indicate what the client did with the escort, rather than what the escort will do.

 

Reese sounds fantastic! But it would be interesting to know whether his ad accurately describes what he does.

[Scorpio]

I think the reviewer appropriately answered the questions based on his experience. How can he report on something he didn't experience. In my opinion, answering the questions any other way would be misleading. Perhaps N/A would have been a more appropriate response, but I haven't written a review in over 5 years so I don't remember if that is an option.

[MscleLovr]

"I think the first-time reviewer didn't understand how to fill out the form."

 

I feel your criticism is invalid. Some years ago when I was hiring, and young men wanted published reviews, I filed numerous reviews; I always detailed SPECIFICALLY what I DID with the escort and how he performed. From my viewpoint, it's very helpful to read in a review what an escort DID with a fit, older client. What the escort MAY do with others can easily be determined by consulting the escort's ad or sending him a polite email.

[Epigonos]

I have to agree that the review appears appropriate for the experience the client had. Although his interests are definitely not mine that is irrelevant as he is writing about his own experience. Based on this review if I were in New York I would certainly consider contacting Reese to determine if we were a fit.

[rvwnsd]

I agree with the others: The reviewer filled out the form based on his own experience, which is appropriate, expected, and accurate. The review form contains help text for each field. The help text for oral states "Please select his oral preferences if appropriate and known." In this case, the reviewer didn't know because he didn't hire the escort for that activity. However, there is a "N/A" selection in the drop-down list, which is what I would probably have chosen if I had engaged in a session of this type.

[Bostonian]

Not sure what Reese did with that client, but I would be happy to do whatever Reese says! Wow. He's amazing!

[uwsman2]

I think you guys are missing my point. The text section is where you relate what you did with the escort. When I read the review, I assumed that the escort was available only for muscle worship, wrestling, etc., because the reviewer listed No for anal or oral. I think if the reviewer wasn't interested in anal or oral and never discussed those activities with the escort, the correct way to fill out the form is to select N/A on the drop box.

[seeker630]

I agree with the others: The reviewer filled out the form based on his own experience, which is appropriate, expected, and accurate. The review form contains help text for each field. The help text for oral states "Please select his oral preferences if appropriate and known." In this case, the reviewer didn't know because he didn't hire the escort for that activity. However, there is a "N/A" selection in the drop-down list, which is what I would probably have chosen if I had engaged in a session of this type.

 

The directions for the "his activites' are as follows:

 

This section contains the 'Activities' if appropriate for the review.

 

The information should be as he advertises it because each client's mileage may vary

.

 

These fields are all optional but are nice to know.

 

I read that as saying, list what his ad says. The 'Session information' section is the place for describing what he actually did with the client.

 

I'm well aware, however, that many reviewers don't adhere to those directions.

[relaxmeny]

DId anyone on here actually meet this guy?

[+ g56whiz]

DId anyone on here actually meet this guy?

 

I hope so because future meetings are unlikely. The ad is now down. Alas!

[Luvmuscle]

I did in fact just meet up with Reese. Did a Vegas vacation. He is hot as f-ck and he knows it (which is a turn on for me lol), heads turning wherever we went! Great guy and one of my best experiences ever! Review already submitted.

[BaronArtz]

Reviews #9 and #10 appear to be exactly the same - word for word. Both reviews published a few days apart with the latest one published on March 10. Is this an oversight maybe? It doesn't help the credibility of the escort, nor of the reviewer, if it isn't.

 

It seems his RB ad is down anyway.

[Luvmuscle]

Reviews #9 and #10 appear to be exactly the same - word for word. Both reviews published a few days apart with the latest one published on March 10. Is this an oversight maybe? It doesn't help the credibility of the escort, nor of the reviewer, if it isn't.

 

It seems his RB ad is down anyway.

 

My take on it, is that it was an administrative error or possibly a correction of sorts. The original review that ran onThurs March 6th listed his locale as "World" when it is in fact "NYC" which is now listed on the Tues March 10th review. I don't think anyone would be crazy (stupid) enough to try submitting the same review within days of each other and not think it wouldn't be noticed.

[Nycbuilder]

I've met Reese a few times. He's very nice. Very muscled! He has never let me take his shorts off though. I don't care that much. It's just funny that he talks about how hung he is. I've met him three times. I have never cum with him. lol. Again. I don't care that much. He's a stud. Anyone know other guys his size?

[DaddyCub]

I'm surprised he's never let you take his shorts off. I've never had that problem with him, and he is definitely well hung. It's in proportion to the rest of him which is massive.

[TruHart1]

Since this revival of an old thread just seems (to me) to have come out of the blue, here's a link to his Daddy's (his most recent review was 6/9) reviews page: www.daddysreviews.com/cruise/newest/reese_nyc

 

TruHart1