Jump to content

CF Dawson available...


big-n-tall
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Did you happen to read the Las Vegas guy's profile? He is advertising as straight and available for women -

 

 

Uhm... sure, but he's not the guy the post is about. :-)

If you scroll down, to the last guy on the page...

 

DAWSON

Caucasian

Height: 5"11"

Weight : 195 lbs.

Hair Color : Blonde

Eye Color : Blue

Age :27

Penis: 7" Cut

Sex Preference: Versatile

Body Hair: Shaved

Non smoker

Sexual Orientation; Straight

 

Available for male & female clients

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd be willing to give him a shot, even though I'm not fond of shaved guys (too prickly). However, I find this site not very informative, and I don't like to give out all the information they ask for without knowing prices. I might go as high as $300/hr to try him, but for someone who had not been reviewed, and advertises at straight raises some red flags with me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The absence of rate information on the site is very odd to me. Why waste prospective clients' time and the agency's time constantly exchanging rate information? Maybe it's a case of "if you have to ask ... " Since I do have to ask, no Dawson for me, I guess. Crapster! he's right here in Vegas too!! And did you catch the little detail about a 30% deposit on all dates longer than an hour? Uh oh ...

My ignore list:  marylander1940, MiamiLooker, stevenkesslar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately I found him before Corbin Fisher started filming bareback. The bareback history doesn't change the fantasy - - just the willingness to act on it.

 

Ditto. He was my favorite CF model for years, and I downloaded almost every video he made (whether it was "gay," "bi," or "straight") until I stopped subscribing to that particular website. Even with CF's change to bareback, I'd be seriously tempted to engage his services. He's about as close to my fantasy guy as I've ever found on video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bareback history doesn't change the fantasy - - just the willingness to act on it.

 

Ok, I'm just a little confused here. And though I may take flack I'm going to dive right in.

First, I don't agree with bareback in porn. I think it sets a poor example.

However, it is my understanding that this studio does thorough testing of their guys to ensure safety and has strict rules in place in order to stay employed with them and to assist in the safety issue.

Not only that, wouldn't you be playing safe if you hired him?

So why is his BB history such a big deal? Especially if he's still safe? (which granted we don't know at this point)

What about the guys you do hire? Just because they don't mention it doesn't mean they don't do it.

I just am not sure I understand why there's such a red flag as compared to others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I'm just a little confused here. And though I may take flack I'm going to dive right in.

First, I don't agree with bareback in porn. I think it sets a poor example.

However, it is my understanding that this studio does thorough testing of their guys to ensure safety and has strict rules in place in order to stay employed with them and to assist in the safety issue.

Not only that, wouldn't you be playing safe if you hired him?

So why is his BB history such a big deal? Especially if he's still safe? (which granted we don't know at this point)

What about the guys you do hire? Just because they don't mention it doesn't mean they don't do it.

I just am not sure I understand why there's such a red flag as compared to others.

 

I suppose I would argue that risky behavior - however it manifests itself - is a cause for caution. If an escort had a known history of substance abuse / addiction, that would also be a cause for caution. Simple as that.

 

You make many valid points that are easy to rationalize and digest; that being said, risky behavior is hard to overlook for a number of us.

-T.S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I'm just a little confused here. And though I may take flack I'm going to dive right in.

First, I don't agree with bareback in porn. I think it sets a poor example.

However, it is my understanding that this studio does thorough testing of their guys to ensure safety and has strict rules in place in order to stay employed with them and to assist in the safety issue.

Not only that, wouldn't you be playing safe if you hired him?

So why is his BB history such a big deal? Especially if he's still safe? (which granted we don't know at this point)

What about the guys you do hire? Just because they don't mention it doesn't mean they don't do it.

I just am not sure I understand why there's such a red flag as compared to others.

 

While I don't subscribe to many posters' aversion to escorts they know have done BB in or out of porn, I suppose the concern is more of an emotional, rather than a strictly logical or rational reaction. I'm like you, in that since I insist on using condoms, then the escort's BB history doesn't matter, so long as I confirm that they'll play safe with me. This is also because I take the position that every sex partner is potentially HIV positive, and since I won't be celibate or categorically shun or exclude positive guys, it's just my responsibility to protect myself. From this perspective, the guy's history is irrelevant because it's all about my conduct. But I recognize that not everyone is Mr. Spock or Data from the Star Trek universe, and doesn't have to approach things from such a strict logical perspective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I'm just a little confused here. And though I may take flack I'm going to dive right in.

First, I don't agree with bareback in porn. I think it sets a poor example.

However, it is my understanding that this studio does thorough testing of their guys to ensure safety and has strict rules in place in order to stay employed with them and to assist in the safety issue.

Not only that, wouldn't you be playing safe if you hired him?

So why is his BB history such a big deal? Especially if he's still safe? (which granted we don't know at this point)

What about the guys you do hire? Just because they don't mention it doesn't mean they don't do it.

I just am not sure I understand why there's such a red flag as compared to others.

 

If the studios only use the Antibody test, which is the only immediate test, then there can be up to a three to six month window where you are actually positive and can infect others, but the test will show you negative. If the studios use a nucleus acid test, the window is reportedly decreased to two weeks. I wonder what tests the studios use.

 

Gman

Gman

 

In brightest day, in blackest night, No evil shall escape my sight. Let those who worship evil's might, Beware my power, The Great Gazoo is always right!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also has been a fantasy of mine and I would play safe if I got the chance to be with him. Also, I think he is married and might have a child, so (even tho it makes no difference at all because we would play safe) it would increase my sense of security. He has always been on my list, as has the other Dawson at Treasure Island. I would still play safe but I would have a bit more trepidation because he has starred in movies where he gets barebacked by 50 guys all at one time. Silly me.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Make America Sane Again

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I'm just a little confused here. And though I may take flack I'm going to dive right in.

First, I don't agree with bareback in porn. I think it sets a poor example.

However, it is my understanding that this studio does thorough testing of their guys to ensure safety and has strict rules in place in order to stay employed with them and to assist in the safety issue.

Not only that, wouldn't you be playing safe if you hired him?

So why is his BB history such a big deal? Especially if he's still safe? (which granted we don't know at this point)

What about the guys you do hire? Just because they don't mention it doesn't mean they don't do it.

I just am not sure I understand why there's such a red flag as compared to others.

 

Kevin - fair question. Especially since I have watched many of his bareback scenes. If I am going to be 100% honest (types the man writing under a pseudonym) my thoughts change each day I read this chain. Bottom line is that all of the escorts I've hired advertise as safe sex and I've had no knowledge otherwise. I've never considered hiring someone I've known to have engaged in bareback activities, so now that I know that Dawson could be hired, I might find myself changing my mind in a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I'm just a little confused here. And though I may take flack I'm going to dive right in.

First, I don't agree with bareback in porn. I think it sets a poor example.

However, it is my understanding that this studio does thorough testing of their guys to ensure safety and has strict rules in place in order to stay employed with them and to assist in the safety issue.

Not only that, wouldn't you be playing safe if you hired him?

So why is his BB history such a big deal? Especially if he's still safe? (which granted we don't know at this point)

What about the guys you do hire? Just because they don't mention it doesn't mean they don't do it.

I just am not sure I understand why there's such a red flag as compared to others.

 

what gay porn studios say and what they do are usually two different things. lots of guys work hiv+ and not just for treasure island media. until theres an independent, third party present at shoots, mandating and administering the testing, I wouldn't trust any bare back shoot to be anything in the vicinity of 'safe'

 

for me and a lot of other clients its the mind set of someone who would play unsafe in this age. the mentality of that is a huge red flag in itself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the studios only use the Antibody test, which is the only immediate test, then there can be up to a three to six month window where you are actually positive and can infect others, but the test will show you negative. If the studios use a nucleus acid test, the window is reportedly decreased to two weeks. I wonder what tests the studios use.

 

I remembered reading this interview so I looked it up. Take from it what you will. :-)

 

"Our testing process is second to none. I can say for myself, since I’ve been a consistently active performer for over four years now, that I have been tested every 30 days of my life for the last four years. We are tested for basically everything, and the company also regularly has us visit and consult with a doctor prior to shoots. We also always get tested a few days before each shoot to rule out any possibilities. I’d imagine the most sterile, controlled environment anyone my age could have sex in would be our sets because of the strict testing."

Reference:

http://thesword.com/corbin-fishers-connor-on-piracy-making-his-scene-partner-cum-three-times-and-why-he-prefers-barebacking.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Current NY Times Article

 

It seems very apropos considering this thread.

 

Rise in Unprotected Sex by Gay Men Spurs H.I.V. Fears

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/28/health/unprotected-sex-among-gay-men-on-the-rise-health-officials-say.html?hp&_r=0

 

Gman

Gman

 

In brightest day, in blackest night, No evil shall escape my sight. Let those who worship evil's might, Beware my power, The Great Gazoo is always right!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I started this thread... which I didn't mean to turn into a bareback debate. :-( I guess I'll add my small bit to the conversation. Would I hire Dawson and have safe sex with him? Absolutely! Would I hire someone like Ray Dalton to have safe sex with? No. Or more to the point, I would be reluctant to because there is a bit of fear/trepidation (which I will get into).

 

Of course, Dawson is doing bareback porn. From what I read, as kevininsa's post reiterates, he is constantly tested. Not that it's 100% secure, but in my mind he is less likely to be hiv positive. Both Corbin Fisher and Sean Cody have a strict policy about their workers, in that, if they contract an std of any kind while under contract they are liable to be let go. Ray D (who is just an example) does bareback porn. He talks/showcases a lot about his barebacking and taking positive loads (which I read on his personal twitter). He also has sex on camera with men who are known/thought to be hiv positive. There in lies my personal fear and reluctance to hire him.

 

I think both guys are hot, rocking bodies, seem to enjoy having sex, and seem to really get into each encounter. However, for me, it comes down to hiring one bareback performer (for safe sex), who is most likely hiv negative. Versus me hiring a bareback performer (for safe sex), who knowingly

flaunts having sex with hiv positive men and taking multiple loads. I'm reluctant to hire someone who appears to be actively being, in effect, a "bug chaser". While having sex with CF Dawson, I wouldn't be constantly thinking about if something happens, i.e. if the condom broke. Whereas with Ray, I'd be extremely paranoid and worried about every action with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...