411: No-ad escort recommended to me by another escort...

[Glenn1441]

In the past, I've had escorts recommend other escorts to me for various reasons. All well and good since the escorts recommended had ads posted online. However, the other day, an escort advertising in Manhattan (who turned out to be more bottom than versatile, and thus not for me) recommended a good friend of his who escorts but does not advertise. It was explained to me that said escort is 'VIP' only. I received a photo and phone number.

Performed a Google Image Search on the photo, and nothing turned up. The phone number is New Jersey-based, very close to NYC in fact.

Today I spoke to the recommended escort, going by the name Adam, and he seemed nice enough. As my schedule does not free up 'til later this week -- and he was on his way to a dentist appointment -- we agreed to speak again Wednesday.

In the meantime, here is the photo shared with me... Any members have experience with him, or know something about him?

Again, an Image Search turned up nothing -- so far so good...

 

[corndog]

That photo doesn't show up... it looks like the URL is for a gmail attachment, so the link is only visible when logged into YOUR gmail account.

[Scorpio]

In the meantime, here is the photo shared with me...

 

That photo doesn't show up...

 

Which is probably a good thing, since the guy doesn't advertise, it's probably not advisable to publicly post his photo.

[Glenn1441]

Thanks guys... wasn't sure how to embed the image since it was sent to me. Probably for the best, as pointed out...

[+ Axiom2001]

...and out of curiosity--I'd wanted to see what this particular unpublished guy look like! - -

[Mark Gordon]

Which is probably a good thing, since the guy doesn't advertise, it's probably not advisable to publicly post his photo.

 

It is DEFINITELY not advisable to post the photo of someone who doesn't advertise.

[Guest countryboywny]

It is DEFINITELY not advisable to post the photo of someone who doesn't advertise.

 

..and that is why members can only post photos that are already available on the web using a link.

[Glenn1441]

I was definitely hasty creating this thread. However, I ultimately discovered that the photo sent to me was not of the escort recommended to me. Since the photo is not available online, I can only assume that the escort who sent the photo to me knows the individual pictured. At any rate, lesson learned. I have since deleted the photo from computer.

[Guest countryboywny]

I was definitely hasty creating this thread. However, I ultimately discovered that the photo sent to me was not of the escort recommended to me. Since the photo is not available online, I can only assume that the escort who sent the photo to me knows the individual pictured. At any rate, lesson learned. I have since deleted the photo from computer.

 

Glenn, Creating this thread, hasty or not, brought attention to the privacy issue and private pics. I think you done good!

[Glenn1441]

Thanks! Not sure I've 'done good,' but the fact that the photo did not display is yet further evidence of Daddy's wisdom. This site, at its best, does provide a solid service to the escort-client community.

 

Glenn, Creating this thread, hasty or not, brought attention to the privacy issue and private pics. I think you done good!

[Guest countryboywny]

I should add that the posting of pictures from private sources can be done here, but only after being vetted and approved by Daddy. I'm thinking of pictures from events like the DC luncheon, the Palm Springs soiree etc. If they are submitted to Daddy via email, he could choose to post them here.. or not.. If I'm wrong on this, please correct me, but I'm sure the privacy of the people depicted is the number one concern.