Today's review of Travis Top - 18 months old?

[+ poolboy48220]

Well, 17 months, anyway. What is the time limit, I thought it was closer to 3-6 months?

[+ Charlie]

The claimed date of the appt. is actually 19 months ago. I, too, thought that there was a time limit much shorter than that for reviews. I can see where an exception MIGHT be made for a highly reputed reviewer, but this is a first timer. (When I first discovered this site in 1999, I wanted to review a couple of escorts whom I had seen more than a year earlier, but Hooboy told me that was too long ago.)

[+ FreshFluff]

Well, 17 months, anyway.

 

Isn't that a little young for the P4P biz?

[uwsman2]

I think it was totally out of line to post that review. And I thought Daddy's rules were that reviews could only be of recent sessions. Especially a negative diatribe like that, against which the poor escort is basically defenseless because the chances that he would remember a session that long ago are slight unless he had developed a continuing relationship with the client.

 

Reviews should tell us what the escort is like now, not almost two years ago.

 

What I would want to know is whether the pictures are accurate today, because Travis looks like the kind of totally hot top I would want to meet if those pics are accurate. And the response he wrote is excellent (apart from the spelling errors), and suggests that he sincerely wants to be a successful escort and knows that serving the needs of his clients is how to do that. If I lived in Boston, I'd be on the phone soon making an appointment....

 

Travis, do you ever travel to NYC?

[+ sam.fitzpatrick]

I too was surprised by the age of the review. However, what impressed me was the professionalism in the response Travis wrote.

[seeker630]

I too was surprised by the age of the review. However, what impressed me was the professionalism in the response Travis wrote.

 

I agree on both counts.

[zeyfur]

I agree on both counts.

 

I woul be more inclined to hire Travis based on reading his response to the review.

[Bosguy]

I think it was totally out of line to post that review. And I thought Daddy's rules were that reviews could only be of recent sessions. Especially a negative diatribe like that, against which the poor escort is basically defenseless because the chances that he would remember a session that long ago are slight unless he had developed a continuing relationship with the client.

 

Reviews should tell us what the escort is like now, not almost two years ago.

 

What I would want to know is whether the pictures are accurate today, because Travis looks like the kind of totally hot top I would want to meet if those pics are accurate. And the response he wrote is excellent (apart from the spelling errors), and suggests that he sincerely wants to be a successful escort and knows that serving the needs of his clients is how to do that. If I lived in Boston, I'd be on the phone soon making an appointment....

 

Travis, do you ever travel to NYC?

 

A while ago I contacted Daddy because I had not submitted a review (positive) for one of my favorite guys (well reviewed, popular working guy and former EOY) due to some serious personal issues. I thought there was a time issue, but could not locate the info in FAQ portion of the site. Daddy very nicely told me it was 1 year from the time of the session. He explained the reasoning that included the possibility of misconception of the validity of the review due to time elapsed and the possible difficulty of the working guy responding if he had questions about the review.

 

Made sense to me and is a good guideline. Daddy. If I was incorrect in posting your info to me, please correct me.

 

Boston Bill

[bigvalboy]

I agree on both counts.

 

+1

[+ WilliamM]

I agree with all the comments about the length of time between the event and the review. However, this reviewer mentions many of same problems Reviewer #2 encountered in 2011, especially the smells in Travis' apartment.

[Guest]

I agree that 19 months is far too long for a review to be acceptable--and by a first-time reviewer to boot. If I were in Boston, I'd definitely hire the guy.

[Steven_Draker]

We don't know what transpired behind the scenes. The review may have been submitted some time ago and Daddy was waiting for the response to come in and publish both altogether.

[+ Charlie]

We don't know what transpired behind the scenes. The review may have been submitted some time ago and Daddy was waiting for the response to come in and publish both altogether.[/color]

 

The reviewer admits at the opening of the review that the meeting took place a long time ago. Anyway, why would Daddy wait a year and a half for the escort to respond before publishing the review?

[Steven_Draker]

The reviewer admits at the opening of the review that the meeting took place a long time ago. Anyway, why would Daddy wait a year and a half for the escort to respond before publishing the review?

 

A "long time ago" could be within the 12 months timespan that has been mentioned above, Charlie.

 

Only Daddy can address this question properly.

[+ Charlie]

A "long time ago" could be within the 12 months timespan that has been mentioned above, Charlie.

 

Only Daddy can address this question properly.[/color]

It could be, but the reviewer himself gives the date of the meeting as March 2012.

 

You're right that only Daddy can address these questions, and he isn't talking.