Jump to content

Today's review of Travis Top - 18 months old?


poolboy48220
 Share

Recommended Posts

The claimed date of the appt. is actually 19 months ago. I, too, thought that there was a time limit much shorter than that for reviews. I can see where an exception MIGHT be made for a highly reputed reviewer, but this is a first timer. (When I first discovered this site in 1999, I wanted to review a couple of escorts whom I had seen more than a year earlier, but Hooboy told me that was too long ago.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was totally out of line to post that review. And I thought Daddy's rules were that reviews could only be of recent sessions. Especially a negative diatribe like that, against which the poor escort is basically defenseless because the chances that he would remember a session that long ago are slight unless he had developed a continuing relationship with the client.

 

Reviews should tell us what the escort is like now, not almost two years ago.

 

What I would want to know is whether the pictures are accurate today, because Travis looks like the kind of totally hot top I would want to meet if those pics are accurate. And the response he wrote is excellent (apart from the spelling errors), and suggests that he sincerely wants to be a successful escort and knows that serving the needs of his clients is how to do that. If I lived in Boston, I'd be on the phone soon making an appointment....

 

Travis, do you ever travel to NYC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was totally out of line to post that review. And I thought Daddy's rules were that reviews could only be of recent sessions. Especially a negative diatribe like that, against which the poor escort is basically defenseless because the chances that he would remember a session that long ago are slight unless he had developed a continuing relationship with the client.

 

Reviews should tell us what the escort is like now, not almost two years ago.

 

What I would want to know is whether the pictures are accurate today, because Travis looks like the kind of totally hot top I would want to meet if those pics are accurate. And the response he wrote is excellent (apart from the spelling errors), and suggests that he sincerely wants to be a successful escort and knows that serving the needs of his clients is how to do that. If I lived in Boston, I'd be on the phone soon making an appointment....

 

Travis, do you ever travel to NYC?

 

A while ago I contacted Daddy because I had not submitted a review (positive) for one of my favorite guys (well reviewed, popular working guy and former EOY) due to some serious personal issues. I thought there was a time issue, but could not locate the info in FAQ portion of the site. Daddy very nicely told me it was 1 year from the time of the session. He explained the reasoning that included the possibility of misconception of the validity of the review due to time elapsed and the possible difficulty of the working guy responding if he had questions about the review.

 

Made sense to me and is a good guideline. Daddy. If I was incorrect in posting your info to me, please correct me.

 

Boston Bill

Live Your Dreams With Passion And Purpose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree on both counts.

 

+1

the greatest beauty is

Organic wholeness, the wholeness of life and things,

the divine beauty of the universe.

Love that, not man apart from that,

or else you will share man’s pitiful confusions,

or drown in despair when his days darken."

 

- Robinson Jeffers

 

B e l i e v e

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We don't know what transpired behind the scenes. The review may have been submitted some time ago and Daddy was waiting for the response to come in and publish both altogether.[/color]

 

The reviewer admits at the opening of the review that the meeting took place a long time ago. Anyway, why would Daddy wait a year and a half for the escort to respond before publishing the review?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reviewer admits at the opening of the review that the meeting took place a long time ago. Anyway, why would Daddy wait a year and a half for the escort to respond before publishing the review?

 

A "long time ago" could be within the 12 months timespan that has been mentioned above, Charlie.

 

Only Daddy can address this question properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A "long time ago" could be within the 12 months timespan that has been mentioned above, Charlie.

 

Only Daddy can address this question properly.[/color]

It could be, but the reviewer himself gives the date of the meeting as March 2012.

 

You're right that only Daddy can address these questions, and he isn't talking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...