Jump to content

Taking A Dive


This topic is 6066 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

The lawyer for our government against the tobacco industry has surprised and stunned the court and defense lawyers by asking for tobacco companies to pay $120 Billion LESS than thought necessary according to the goverment's own witness.


With advocates like this, we might as well turn out the lights and close the door!------


Tobacco Escapes Huge Penalty

U.S. Seeks $10 Billion Instead of $130 Billion


By Carol D. Leonnig

Washington Post Staff Writer

Wednesday, June 8, 2005; Page A01


After eight months of courtroom argument, Justice Department lawyers abruptly upset a landmark civil racketeering case against the tobacco industry yesterday by asking for less than 8 percent of the expected penalty.


As he concluded closing arguments in the six-year-old lawsuit, Justice Department lawyer Stephen D. Brody shocked tobacco company representatives and anti-tobacco activists by announcing that the government will not seek the $130 billion that a government expert had testified was necessary to fund smoking-cessation programs. Instead, Brody said, the Justice Department will ask tobacco companies to pay $10 billion over five years to help millions of Americans quit smoking.


Before it was cut, the cessation program was the most significant financial penalty still available to the government as part of its litigation, which had been the largest civil racketeering and conspiracy case in U.S. history. The government contended that six tobacco companies engaged in a 50-year conspiracy to defraud and addict smokers and then conceal the dangers of cigarettes.


"We were very surprised," said Dan Webb, lawyer for Altria Group's Philip Morris USA and the coordinating attorney in the case. "They've gone down from $130 billion to $10 billion with absolutely no explanation. It's clear the government hasn't thought through what it's doing."


The Justice Department offered little explanation for the figure. Associate Attorney General Robert D. McCallum Jr. and members of the trial team declined to answer questions as the court session ended. In 2001, then-Attorney General John D. Ashcroft tried to settle or shelve the government's racketeering case against the industry before a public outcry forced its revival.


"It feels like a political decision to take into consideration the tobacco companies' financial interest rather than health interests of 45 million addicted smokers," said William V. Corr, director of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. "The government proved its case, but the levels of funding are a shadow of the cessation treatment program that the government's own expert witness recommended."


Sources and government officials close to the case said the trial lawyers wanted to request $130 billion for smoking-cessation programs but were pressured by leaders in the attorney general's office, particularly McCallum, to make the cut. Arguments within the Justice Department continued behind the scenes through yesterday morning, according to the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the controversy over the matter.


When the case began in 2004, the government sought to force the tobacco industry to pay $280 billion in allegedly ill-gotten profits. But in February, a federal appeals court ruled that the administration could not seek that penalty.


Michael Fiore, the government expert who recommended $130 billion for cessation programs, is a medical professor and director of a tobacco research center who chaired the subcommittee on tobacco cessation in the Department of Health and Human Services' Interagency Committee on Smoking and Health.


His testimony was widely considered to represent the sum the government was seeking for a cessation program, though Justice Department lawyers had made no formal demand until yesterday.


The strength of the government's case hinged on a large collection of internal tobacco company documents, many of which were never before made public. The government began its case in September by showing on an oversized projection screen the written memos of tobacco executives and scientists as they described their plans to keep customers in the dark about whether their habit was addictive or dangerous and to encourage young people to smoke.


Facing those same internal documents in another suit,the tobacco industry in 1998 agreed to pay $246 billion to settle a lawsuit filed by states to recover their costs for the medical treatment of smokers.




(For the rest of the article, go to washingtonpost.com)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this is for the state governments and not the tobacco companies.


if the fine is too large, the companies will go bankrupt and not continue to pay out the millions they are getting from the last settlement. in addition, the state governments need the smokers to continue to buy the cigarettes so they can continue to get the payments. the states are addicted to the payments and some states have even sold bonds to get money now and the bonds are being paid out from the payments.


the tobaccp companiew raised prices to make the payments so it is a wash for them as they all raised prices together. a worry would be a new company that did not have to make payments and who could undercut the big companys in price.


also, the trial lawyers need the tobacco companies to continue to pay as they need their hundreds of millions of dollars in fees.


in short, the groups against the big dollar suit are not the tobacco companies but the states and lawyers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

of the $113 million lobbying budget about half went to the republicans; can we assume the other half went to the democrats??? like most groups, they give to both sides and the party in power usually gets the most. my guess is when the democrats controlled congress and the white house, they got the lion's share of the lobbying dollars. to make the article fair and balanced, it should show the figures in percentages from those years. in addition, it would be interesting to see the trial lawyer donations as those lawyers have a huige personal stake in the outcome of the tobacco money. finally, the cities and states do lobbying in washington (with our tax payer funds) and it would be interesting to see where those dollars are going.


washington is a colonial power and the people in the fifty states are the colonies; washington is a cespool awash in money that both parties take in. i fail to see why the republicans are singled out. remember will rogers back in the 30's saying that "we have the finest congress that money can buy". some things do not change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


In order to post in the Political Issues forum, all members are required to acknowledge that their post is in compliance with our Community Guidelines.  In addition, you acknowledge that it meets the following requirements: 

  • No personal attacks: Attack the issue not the person
  • No hijacking: Stay on the subject of the thread 

  • No hate speech or offensive terms/expressions

Posts that do not comply with the above requirements will be removed.  Multiple violations may result in a loss of access to this forum.

  • Create New...