Posting Escorts Names

[Guest 101]

There have been several threads in the various forums here from clients who have had a bad experience with an escort. For some unknown reason the originator of these threads refuse to name the escort. Thus, the posted information tends to be useless.

 

Please if you feel that your experience (good or bad) was important enough to share with others then you must name the escort. We are adults and obviously will create our own judgment on the validity and integrity of your words.

 

A post without mention of the escort's name is wasting bandwidth and serves no purpose whatsoever.

 

Thank You.

[Guest cp8036]

Your point is well taken.

 

I had posted, and did not advise the name of the guy or write a review. The post was titled "what makes one upscale" in early July. It was a dull experience (I am being kind), and I was seeing if my expectations were out of line. Based on my story, most all respondants said I was ripped off, and should write a review.

 

I think one escort, DCescort (sp), said I should write a review. However, first email the guy and express my dissatisfaction.

 

I did that, the guy answered that was probably an issue of not good chemisty. It was a polite email, but still didn't acknowledge his short-comings with his services. He went on to say he takes escort work seriously, and wished it would have been a better date for me. And, that if I wanted to call to discuss, please do. Kind of pissed that he didn't accept responsibility for some of his faults (not able to get hard, for example), and his inability to sense I was less than pleased with his services.

 

I called per his invitation, and we talked for a some time. He was very candid on the phone, and said he felt badly, and knew that it was a bad date. He had a bad experience the night before, and he was still shaken (some other things later confirmed there was truth to what he said). Perhaps he was scamming me a bit, manipulating my compassion, I sensed he was forthright. He said I was a very nice guy, so there wasn't any issue with me. Because I was nice, he felt even worse for letting me down. He said he was in no condition to "work" that morning.

 

He offered to buy me another date with another escort, or send a check to repay. I declined both offers. I am selective on who I hire, research quite a bit, so would be hard to just order a "replacement". Maybe I felt sorry for him, but I declined his reimbursement check. We met for the hour, had a pleasant chat, and did have some sex, thus he filled some of his obiligations.

 

He asked if I could please not write a review.

 

While I was/am angry that he still took a client knowing he was unable to fill his role. If an escort is so upset about a very recent incident, he should postpone some appointments until he can recover emotionally.

 

I give him credit for being remorseful and going so far as to offer a reimbursement. His willingness to talk about it showed that he had some concern and ethics. I live on the opposite coast, and would be highly unlikely that he would encounter me again. He could have easily said nothing more than a simple "sorry".

 

I just wish some of his post-date ethics were used earlier. We ended on a nice tone, and agreed to meet for a casual dinner next time one of us travels.

[marc anthony]

I think there is nothing wrong with the way you handled it... that is your personal business. On the other hand, the escort, I think, shouldn't have been so afraid of a negative review either. If you had written a negative review, and if he had responded on this site to it in the way he did personally to you (i.e., I am sorry, it was unprofessional of me, can I call you to offer you a refund, etc.), it wouldn't have hurt him at all! In fact, I think he may have won some points from some of us. All of us know that not every date goes well, and as has been said many, many times, the best escorts respond very well to even poor circumstances and/or poor reviews.

[Guest delhi]

>Your point is well taken.

>

 

Excuse me, but in your post aren't you doing exactly what the author of this thread asked people not to do -- posting a detailed evaluation of an escort without giving his name? If you agree with his point why do you proceed to ignore it?

[Guest cp8036]

Marc,

 

You're correct. Is easy to bask in a nice review. The only time I have seen an escort respond to a good review, and make himself look even worse, was Toby in Phil, PA.

 

But, the manner in which someone rebutts a negative review can say much more about their maturity and ability to respond in the face of adversity.

[Guest]

>>Your point is well taken.

>>

>

>Excuse me, but in your post

>aren't you doing exactly what

>the author of this thread

>asked people not to do

>-- posting a detailed evaluation

>of an escort without giving

>his name? If you

>agree with his point why

>do you proceed to ignore

>it?

 

 

I think he was trying to explain why, in this instance, he chose to do what he did. He's not in any obligation to obey the originator of the thread at all times. Over all, however, I do agree with the thread originator...

[Guest cp8036]

Delhi,

 

Thanks for your kind words and tone. They bring unbridled delight to my mornings.

 

 

<...For some unknown reason the originator of these threads refuse to name the escort...>

 

 

 

I was merely trying to give my reason for not naming an escort, thus taking away one unknown reason.

[Guest delhi]

>Delhi,

>

>Thanks for your kind words and

>tone. They bring unbridled

>delight to my mornings.

 

Irony, to be effective, should lightly etch a phrase, not drip from every word like bacon grease.

 

>I was merely trying to give

>my reason for not naming

>an escort, thus taking away

>one unknown reason.

 

I agree with the thread author. If you're going to give a detailed description of an encounter with an escort that you found less than satisfactory for any reason, you should have enough consideration for your fellow site members to name him.

[marc anthony]

Here is an objective view of the situation... If you are going to post a positive or negative REVIEW, then obviously the escort's name must be included. Otherwise, there would be absolutely no credibility to the story and evaluation (as we know sometimes this is lacking even with the name). However, if you are going to share an experience or ask for advice on the MESSAGE BOARD, it is really up to you if you want to post the name. Quite frankly, with all of the varied topics on this board which are posted and discussed... ranging from very useful to very useless, and very interesting to very boring... I think it is quite clear that freedom of expression is alive and well!

[Guest cp8036]

Anyway,

 

 

<...Irony, to be effective, should lightly etch a phrase, not drip from every word like bacon grease...>

 

There was no irony intended, maybe some sarcasm. Sorry, that my prose is not as refined as yours.

 

It been said many times before, if you don't like thread or a post, don't read it. You are free to read what you like.

 

Really don't see point of being hostile to each other, are enough other things to go after.

[Guest alanm]

There were a number of negative comment about a Miami escort

earlier this month on the message board. Yet, all of his reviews are excellent. I have no way of knowing if you are referring to this escort or another escort. The escort you mentioned, in the

final analysis, behaved fairly well. In the case of the Miami escort, there were so many negative comments that there was no way for him to respond. Even if he was a bit of a con artist,

he was put in an extremely difficult position. It seems to me that if you have a negative experience, you should post a review so the escort can respond. I also understand that the Miami

escort is apparently so charming that some people felt the negative experience was their own fault--it wasn't until a number

of people spoke up that a patern was discovered.

[Guest pickwick]

>It been said many times before,

>if you don't like thread

>or a post, don't read

>it. You are free

>to read what you like.

>

 

We are also free to comment on what we don't like. The thread author and one or two others are saying that if you have a negative experience with an escort and it's worth posting on these message boards then you should name him. I agree. I find it annoying to read a detailed account of a negative experience with an escort and then see that the author has omitted the one fact that makes all the rest useful to others, namely the name. If you don't want to share information with other site members then don't. If you do share information, share all of it.

[Guest FirstPlace]

People have the right to post what they want (within the guidelines of the forums). The people who post negative comments about an escort without advising of the escort's name are probably not being honest about the experience. Therefore, I move on to the next post.

 

I find that the posts that include the escort's name usually have an element of truth about them. It is that simple.

[Guest alanm]

No, it's not that simple. When you post a negative comment about a escort by name, he cannot respond unless you include enough detail from him to identify the client. Without the identifying detail, it's essentially gossip. These guy make all,

or part of their living, by escorting.

[Guest jizzdepapi]

>... it's essentially gossip...

 

huh?

 

if i don't like a restaurant, i tell my friends. if someone asks me for a recommendation, not only do I not recommend that restaurant but may warn them away from it. restaurant owners know this so they try to please their customers--one more thing that keeps them on their toes. usually the restaurant owner is not present when i pan his/her establishment and will not be able to rebut my opinion.

 

so IMHO escorts need to take their work seriously and readers need to carefully weigh in mitigating factors and possible malice on the part of the poster. and consider the review/post in the context of the Review side of this website.

 

in the sometimes cruel world of the Male 4 Male Escorts Review Message Center, sometimes clients and, at other times, escorts will get called names that they never deserved. we'll all survive.

 

that's my take on the subject,

jizz

[Guest bottomboykk]

Well put, Jizz!

[Guest jizzdepapi]

thanks, bottomboy. but, as you might imagine, it's really papi who's supposed to be the well put(er). where, o where, is papi when i need him?

 

jizz