WHY DO I ESCORT???

[Guest Zack Evans]

Recently some people that I know and have known over the years found out that I am an escort. At first, I was a little embarrassed but then I thought to myself "who the fuck cares." I did get some criticism and flack from some people, but on the other hand I got some really good responses from my closest friends such as ..."If I had your looks, I would do it too."

 

Then I thought about why exactly it is that I escort. I don't really have to do this to survive since I am a fairly competent person who graduated from UC Berkeley in 1999. I guess one of the main reasons I escort is because I like many aspects of it. I like meeting new people, engaging in good conversation, exploring new ways of fulfilling the fantasies of others' and I get a bit of the physical intimacy from my clients that I was used to get when I was in a relationship. But I also enjoy sex. I always have. Ever since I can remember, I have been very turned-on and horny at the slightest sight of a naked guy. And being naked, having sex or just cuddling with someone are all things that turn me on incredibly. This way, I like what I do for a living.

 

There are many people who don't like what they do for a living. They hate their jobs, dread going to work and become resentful and bitter individuals. I was one of those people. Right out of college, I tried very hard to mold myself into a job that I hated because society and my family expected that I should do so.

 

Thankfully, I came to my senses and am now pursuing my creative talents here in Los Angeles and I am enjoying what I do for work, escorting. I believe, as most should, that we only live once. And if something makes you feel good or in some way makes you happy, then you should do it. And if you can make money at the same time, then you should REALLY do it. This is something I have discovered at an early age and know that it will take me far in my future.

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Zack,

 

Good for you... the way you handled your 'coming out' to friends.

 

You sound well suited for your chosen avocation -- one of the four types who escort as identified in a previous thread, and the most successful type I believe.

 

Good luck.

[Guest LG320126]

Bravo Zack! You certainly sound like an individual who has his head screwed on (no pun intended) more than a lot of professionals I know. Indeed, you only go around once in life, so make the most of it. Good luck and best wishes.

[N.N.]

Zack, maybe you can answer a question I'm curious about.

 

I wrote one of the two reviews of you on this site that describe

you flaking out. In my case, you didn't follow through on one

planned appointment, didn't call the next day as you'd promised,

and never wrote back when I emailed you to ask why. I don't

expect you to remember the details of what happened several

months ago, but I have a more general question: what is going

through your mind when you flake out on clients? Do you just

have so many offers that you throw some away, and don't care

whether you do it considerately or not?

[Losgatan]

Zack,

 

I find it interesting that you started another thread here today but failed to answer the question in the previous post of this thread.

 

We won't bite. Just tell us what happened.

[+ deej]

>Do

>you just

>have so many offers that you

>throw some away, and don't

>care

>whether you do it considerately or

>not?

 

I'll be looking for this answer as well.

 

I recently had time booked with a Falcon Exclusive pornstar/escort during his visit here, but a day before his visit I got email graciously explaining that he had cancelled the trip and was returning home. (He'a an Aussie, which should narrow it down for you guys.) Ten minutes after reading the email I got a phone call on his nickel and we talked for a long time.

 

He cemented my determination to see him just with the e-mail. The phone call totally clinched it. He's an absolute sweetheart.

 

(and for those who can't read between the lines, I'm talking about DYLAN REECE.)

 

He actually asked if I'd still be interested in 10 months when he comes back to the US. (ummm ... YES!)

 

The way he cancelled was sweet and considerate.

 

There's never an excuse for a no-show, unless there was a communication issue and expectations were unclear.

 

(as always, the sexretary will disavow all knowledge of this moderator's words and this tape will blow up in ..... RUNNNNNNNN!!!!!)

 

[Guest Zack Evans]

Maybe I do get so many calls that I am not able to answer each and everyone that I receive. I am sorry but I am only human.

 

I do MY VERY BEST to return ALL CALLS AND E-MAILS.

 

I apologize if I offended anyone.

 

Zack

[Guest Zack Evans]

I am also clueless as to the "No-Show" implication that was made towards me. I NEVER flake on anyone and do not recollect ANY incidents where that would have been possible.

 

I do apologize if that's ever occurred. As you can see from my reviews, I am a qualitative escort who cares about what he does and who takes this business VERY SERIOUSLY.

[N.N.]

We had a date for January 7, 2001; you'd promised to call me

on Jan 6 to finalize details, but never did. It was not a

'no-show' but rather a failure to follow through on a date

we had agreed on. I asked why, and you sent email on Jan 7

assuring me that you did want my business, and said "I will

call you today, for sure" (but didn't call). You didn't

respond to subsequent email asking what had happened.

If you like, I'll send you copies of the emails to refresh

your memory.

 

It's annoying when I make plans based on an escort's promises

and they don't follow through. I do not relish bringing all

this up in a public forum; if you'd answered when I asked in

private email, that would've been the end of it.

 

Maybe you do have your act together now, and if so, good for

you. But you did flake on me, and evidently also on the

person who submitted review #3. I still don't have an

answer to my original question (just what were you thinking

when you did that sort of thing).

[Donnie]

Q: Why did Zack start this thread?

 

A: To promote himself. He's practically rewriting Jason Reardone's posts, although he lacks the sincerity that comes thru in Jason's.

[Guest Zack Evans]

RE: Q: Why did Zack start this thread?

 

I am NOT re-writing anyone's posts. And I am not trying to promote myself by posting to this site. I write posts to this site because I like to be heard and I like the interection with people who I can identify with.

 

Whoever is making such accusations apparently does not know me AT ALL and probably has a personal problem.

[CT Dick]

Zack, I'm sorry this thread has gotten sidetracked on the issue of your "flaking" but there seem to be some valid questions.

 

Nonetheless...

 

I, for one, loved to read your posting and wonder if you could expand on the negatives and how they balance against the positives.

 

Dick

[Guest Zack Evans]

Was that question directed to me? Because if so, I have NO idea what you're referring to.

 

Like I said before, I am a reliable person and if I cannot keep an appointment, I would call and cancel. I would NEVER leave anyone hanging, EVER. To me, that's completely wrong and immature.

 

By that same token, it has happened to me where a client has been a "no-show." At first I was a little preturbed, but then it comes with the territory of this business and you MOVE ON. Some people on here are so bitter and hold such anomosity towards escorts. That's such a waste of negative energy. For me, I don't let flakey clients get to me. Life's too short.

[Guest regulation]

>It's annoying when I make plans

>based on an escort's promises

>

>and they don't follow through.

 

 

I've been there, N.N., and I agree that it's annoying. Since he continues to deny all knowledge, why don't you go ahead and send him copies of the emails? If you do, he'll have to respond to your questions or stop posting in this thread.

 

 

>I do not relish bringing

>all

>this up in a public forum;

>if you'd answered when I

>asked in

>private email, that would've been the

>end of it.

>

[N.N.]

regulation: as you suggested, I sent Zack a

copy of correspondence we'd had in January.

He remembered the situation and, to his credit,

explained to me (privately) what had happened.

[Guest regulation]

>regulation: as you suggested, I

>sent Zack a

>copy of correspondence we'd had in

>January.

>He remembered the situation and, to

>his credit,

>explained to me (privately) what had

>happened.

 

Zack emailed me privately also. Here is his message:

 

WHY DON'T YOU GET A LIFE ASSHOLE.

 

THERE ARE TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY.

 

PATHETIC OLD FART FUCK YOU.

 

As many of us have indicated before, the way escorts respond to questions and criticism of their work can tell us more about what they're really like than the reviews of clients do. I think that's true in this case also.

[CT Dick]

Zack, please respond:

 

>Zack emailed me privately also.

>Here is his message:

>

>WHY DON'T YOU GET A LIFE

>ASSHOLE.

>

>THERE ARE TWO SIDES TO EVERY

>STORY.

>

>PATHETIC OLD FART FUCK YOU.

 

 

Zack, is this true?

[Guest Konga]

After a beautiful liftoff, this fellow seems to be burning up in re-entry. With just a few prompts from some boardmembers here, and Zacks' own actions and reactions, this thread has gone from "we love you!" to "we'll lynch you!" Fascinating. You would have to be a Clinton or a Gotti (or maybe an Achilles) to withstand the scrutiny of every Walter Winchell holding court at this site. I think there's a good reason that some of the more beloved escorts around here keep a lower profile. It can be an unforgiving arena, but it's an arena in a fishbowl. It allows glimpses into the minds and motives of some escorts, but these glimpses are often refracted and don't give an entirely accurate portrait. In spite of Zack's current dilemma, I'm sure there are dozens of clients who would swear by his services. At least I hope there are.

I also hope Zack can either scramble out of this (although "fuck you old fart" will be tough to mitigate), or take his lumps and move on without any more vulgar flaming. But he owes US no explanations, only the client in question. And I'm sure the other gentleman who was flamed would appreciate an apology.

[Justice]

RE: Zack, please respond:

 

Sigh! Here we go again! Posting a copy of a thread from the private escort forum is one of the reasons why HooBoy decided to moderate the forums. I agree that Zack's response was more than a little offensive. However, I have two problems with the posting of the response. First, it was a private e-mail that was sent in response to a private e-mail. It should have stayed that way. Second, we've only seen the response. We have no idea what was said in the original e-mail. For all we know, that e-mail may have said things that Zack found offensive.

[Barry]

RE: Zack, please respond:

 

I may have missed something but I don't see where this was a response to an email by Regulation. It sounds more like an unsolicited email.

[Guest regulation]

RE: Zack, please respond:

 

>Sigh! Here we go again! Posting

>a copy of a thread

>from the private escort forum

>is one of the reasons

>why HooBoy decided to moderate

>the forums. I agree that

>Zack's response was more than

>a little offensive. However, I

>have two problems with the

>posting of the response. First,

>it was a private e-mail

>that was sent in response

>to a private e-mail. It

>should have stayed that way.

 

 

Your statement is completely false. I sent Zack no email message of any kind. I have never communicated with him other than by posting messages on this message board for everyone to read.

 

As to the issue of "privacy," I have stated on this message board in the past that people who send me unsolicited emails had better realize that I feel free to do with them whatever I please. I consider it utterly absurd to complain that your privacy is violated because you send an unsolicited email -- particularly hate mail such as I received -- to a complete stranger and he chooses to share it with others.

 

 

>Second, we've only seen the

>response. We have no idea

>what was said in the

>original e-mail. For all we

>know, that e-mail may have

>said things that Zack found

>offensive.

 

Once again, your statement is completely and totally false. I sent him nothing.

[Guest regulation]

RE: Zack, please respond:

 

>I may have missed something but

>I don't see where this

>was a response to an

>email by Regulation. It

>sounds more like an unsolicited

>email.

 

 

Thanks, Barry, for having eyes and for knowing how to use them.

[Guest regulation]

>And I'm sure

>the other gentleman who was

>flamed would appreciate an apology.

>

 

No, I would not. There is nothing he could possibly say that would get me to believe that the sentiments he expressed were other than completely sincere.

[Justice]

RE: Zack, please respond:

 

>I may have missed something but

>I don't see where this

>was a response to an

>email by Regulation. It

>sounds more like an unsolicited

>email.

 

You're right. I stand corrected. Sorry Regulation.

[Justice]

RE: Zack, please respond:

 

AHHH! I don't know why, but I didn't notice that you included a quote in your response. (I think that it's time for a trip to the eye doctor.) I'm so sorry. I'm eating humble pie. Zack's response was way out of line. He owes you an apology and an expanation! Please forgive me.