Jump to content

A dead-horse of a different color


Rod Hagen
 Share

This topic is 7515 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

Back in the days of "Skeptic", reviews like my new # 22 today http://207.14.53.20/reviews/rodhagen.html were labeled useful/useless in long threads on this message center.

 

I know that it's light on the physical stuff, but I gotta believe that it's helpful to people looking beyond all that. What do you all think now that some time has passed since we last time covered this controversy?

 

http://www.rodhagen.com

-RH

Fun, Fit, Friendly in West Hollywood/Los Angeles and Southern California

RH--RentMen         RH-Website           RH-MassageAd            My 100+ Gushing Reviews     Email: [email protected]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In my opinion, a review like that is very helpful because I'm always interested in the total experience as opposed to the purely physical. It's the type of review that I tend to write myself. I also think that reviews of this nature are especially helpful in scheduling longer appointments because one needs to get a sense of whether or not one will be compatiable with that person. And I believe reviews like this often give you a sense of the escorts personality, which is also very important.

 

However, I have found that decisions should not be based on the reviews alone. For me it's very important to establish some sort of rapport with escort prior to the meeting. Reviews are an important part of the process, but we must all remember that one man's night in heaven may not be another man's cup of tea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest trekker

Hey, Rod, I think he liked you. Either that, or maybe you wrote it yourself... :D

 

I wasn't around for the previous discussion so I don't know what was said then.

I agree with Scorpio's comment. I think it's important to have an insight into more than just the physical aspects. Of course, it's nice to have some info about the physical stuff, too. I don't mean a porn novelette, although it can be fun to read those too, but just something for the reader to get a sense of whether this would be a good escort for him. But that's not so relevant in the case of this review because you have so many earlier reviews with that info, and the reviewer even pointed that out.

 

So that makes this case a little unusual, since you have a very large number of reviews before this one. I would always appreciate this kind of information in a review (it's not just about the sex for me), but as a first or second or even third review I would feel that it is lacking and should have included at least something about the physical. This is not a comment about the review in question, since it refers readers to the previous remarks about the physical stuff, and, as a later review on top of (ooh, did I say that?) well-established info on the physical aspects that can be expected, I think it's great.

 

In fact, it makes me want to try to get to LA sometime soon.... :*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rod,

The first 33 paragraphs looked pretty good, but I couldn't make it through the rest of the novella. You know that years of alphabet soup have given me the attention span of a gnat (other than for the Code and Regs, of course). Your posts here show a great attitude, and no one's challenged the pic yet, so I think you've aready lain the bait.

 

Later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...