Truth in Advertising

[Guest regulation]

>Regulation,

>

>Because you asked me a question,

>I interpret that you wish

>a repsonse.

>

>You make it very difficult, impossible

>really, for someone trying to

>extend to you the benefit

>of the doubt.

 

Please don't give yourself a philosophical backache on my account. Your doubts are of no benefit to me whatsoever. I was perfectly happy with the decision you announced in the thread about Sean's taping to cease communicating with me on these boards. I urge you to stick to your resolution in the future rather than try to come up with excuses for violating it. Please feel free NOT to respond.

[NY Observer]

Red,

Not that I care to state MY views on this thread any more, but I made NO response to regulation here.

[NY Observer]

Yawn!!!

Methinks there are way too many rules and regulations here.

[Guest craigrc]

Is this absolutely, positively your last word on the subject? Or was that Post #26?

[Guest Jake]

Well reg .. i mean segeth ... i mean craigrc ... with fun people like you, it's hard to not make one final comment.

[Guest craigrc]

Jake, come on now and level with us. You really are Tammy Faye Bakker, aren't you? Admit it!

[Guest Jake]

LAST EDITED ON Aug-30-00 AT 10:06AM (EST)[p]Just around the eyes. BTW, it's Messner now, hun!

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

LAST EDITED ON Aug-30-00 AT 02:12PM (EST)[p]LAST EDITED ON Aug-30-00 AT 12:54 PM (EST)

 

regulation

 

I felt obliged to answer your warm response, your plea nothwithstanding.

 

I am touched by your concern for my back and your conern for my (waste of time) trying to engage you in meaningful dialog. And while I've learned this lesson well enough, I extend to you the courtesy (Lord knows why?) to give you notice that I may feel compelled on occasion not to let pass some of your comments. Hopefully these will be rare occasions. But we all (even you) need some thoughtful response to our remarks and I may feel compelled to weigh in occasionally, not so much to offer you any insight or llumination, I'm sure you won't be in need of it, but possibly others participating in the ongoing discussion might have interest. Just so you don't feel I blindsided you.

 

I have harbored the suspcion for quite some time now that you are the one and the same person also known as SKEPTIC and NEWBIE (and other probable alter egos). The writing style and acrimonious tone of many of your messages are very reminiscent of these other identities. You also possess serious intellectual capacity, simlar to those identities. All that, and you seem to have been born out of the firmament on July 31, of this year, as far as your active participation in this community. If this revelation of your identity is true, it might explain, in part, your warm feelings for me given some exchanges under your other identity. (Or does is stem from 'Misguided and Muddled'? -- no matter) Of course, I might be in error, if so you should set the community straight, but please don't compromise your veracity on my account, if that means anything to you. (I admit, after the discussion of email confidentiality I'm unsure of your position on this kind of issue.) Also consider that an evasion of the question provides an interesting interpretation as well.

 

If I am correct in my conjecture, I am puzzled why you feel the need to shed identities on a seasonal basis, if not more often, does the baggage associated with them become too burdensome for even you to carry??

 

We are known by our enemies and the flip side also applies -- we are known by our friends. I am comfortable with the former, and your friends (alter egos?) seem constant in their loyalty.

 

It is impossible for us to escape our personality over the long term, those of us that have only one, that is.

 

And thank you, I did have a nice day!

[Guest regulation]

TY, if it comforts you to believe that all of the posters with whom you have disagreed on these boards are really the same person, go ahead. As Freud said, "Illusions commend themselves to us because they save us pain and allow us to enjoy pleasure instead." For the record, my posts on these boards did not begin on July 31, nor do I take responsibility for the posts of anyone other than myself. I do not know or care how many screen names you use.

 

I visit these boards because I'm interested in the opinions of others on specific escorts, and on the practices and customs of escorts and clients in general. Opinions on other subjects, such as whether it is a good use of my time to reply to someone who presumes to lecture me on my physical or age preferences for escorts, interest me not at all. Nor does it matter to me whether you choose to reply to or comment on my posts. You are one of a number of posters (unless you are all the same person, which I suppose is possible) who seem to have the habit of declaring you will say no more on a given subject, only to come back again and again to say even more. Whether this is because of a tender concern for the clarity of the discussion or just because you have nothing very important to do with your time, I really can't say. I do find it amusing, though.

[Guest continental]

Would you guys please do the rest of us a favor and refrain from turning this thread into a personal argument? It has nothing to do with the subject of the thread and it is boooooooorrrrrrriiiiiiiinnnnnnnggggggg. Thank you.

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

Ah, a non-denial denial, how very unsurprising!

[Guest Tampa Yankee]

A new player takes the field.

 

Continental,

 

Welcome, are you pinch-hitting for craigrc whose well timed appearances were becoming obvious or are you legit?? No matter, it will become obvious soon enough.

 

As for being bored, you are in ultimate control of what you allow to bore you, use your faculties to make a choice, this is an interactive medium.

 

As for straying from the topic, yes, I'm afraid so, just seems to happen when regulator and I cross paths. My apologies to the board, but some things cannot be left unanswered. The good new is that I have raised an issue that I thought needed airing. I am satisified for now, hope you are too.

[Bilbo]

Not only does Continental have a delete switch or a get me out of here quickly device in the handy rating system numbers, but by the time he has been here very long he will learn that once a thread has gone over around 30 or so (not an exact number) of postings, we are guaranteed not to be on the subject any more. Personally, I find many of our best conversations happen when those of us around the cracker barrel go off of subject and have been known to check a thread whose main subject does not move me if it goes over the aforesaid around 30 postings, just to make sure I don't miss an interesting divergence.

[Guest regulation]

Continental, what can I say? You're right. TY and I have badly frayed this and other threads because he enjoys indulging in pompous rhetoric and silly games of one-upmanship, and I let him chivvy me into playing along during moments of extreme boredom. I apologize to you. In mitigation of my offense, let me say that having given up both smoking and drinking I am now trying to cut down on the harmless but nonsensical and time-wasting activity of bantering with dorks. You must not expect that TY will ever cut down. With him, not just some things but everything must not go unanswered.

 

TY is right in saying that you are in control of what bores you, in the sense that it is easy to avoid his (and my) posts by looking at the list of posts at the top of each thread. I encourage you to make use of this simple precaution.

[Guest aarronn]

>

>Another example: Aarronn in Toronto. In

>his website, he doesn't say

>how old he is. Interestingly,

>every review he has on

>this site says that he

>is 24 or 25. Well,

>I met Aarronn a few

>weeks back. He is at

>least 30-32. A very, very

>nice guy...but not a 24

>y/o twinkie!

 

 

Let me start by saying that I usually don't have time for these games, but this topic was very amusing to me. I don't know what you consider a "twinkie" but in my eyes, it's usually someone under the age of 21. I don't even PRETEND to be a twinkie as you can tell in my pics. But I do have a confession that has been weighing heavy on my shoulders. I hope you all won't be too disappointed. I did tell a BIG lie.

 

 

 

MY REAL NAME ISN'T AARRONN

 

and strange as it may be, that subject never came up in this little discussion on "truth in advertising"

[Guest torjon]

Well, that DOES it!!!

Not only does one of my favourite escorts have the audacity to look years younger than Dick Ho alledges he is, I now find out that his name isn't really AARRONN!!!!

Oh,man...this is all too much. I was having the best time of my life with this guy, and all the time it wasn't even HIM! What audacity! What cheek!

Hey, wait..could this also mean that Matt isn't Matt....that Mike isn't Mike....that Sean isn't Sean..Omigod! And what if they are a couple years older? This is all so much a part of good sex that I don't think I want to continue this sinful charade.

Cheek firmly extended by tongue, fellows.

Aarronn, that was one of the wittiest,sharpest and RIGHT ON THE FUCKING MONEY responses by ANY escort.

You are the coolest, buddy. See you SOON!

[Guest MrB]

Touché--very, very funny. I don't think it's entirely fair, though. The stage name you choose doesn't change who you are professionally, what you look like, how you're built or the services you provide. Age, weight, hair colour and penis size, a college degree (...) these things are measurable and definable and I don't think it's OK to lie about them. Just because most escorts do exaggerate doesn't make it OK either.

Should clients bring their tape measures in future and send guys away if they exaggerated? :-)

What's a poor size queen to do???

[Traveller]

LAST EDITED ON Sep-05-00 AT 09:36AM (EST)[p]With all of this folderal (that's an awful big word for an eight year old), I think I'll just have to measure Rick myself.

 

Later.

 

PS. BTW, with a three day weekend, does Terrible Tuesday (T squared for Tampa Yankee) become whacked-out Wednesday. Just wondering.

 

PPS. Kiki's boatride was fun, as always.

[Rick Munroe]

>I think I'll just have to

>measure Rick myself.

 

The last time someone took a ruler to me was Mrs. Henderson in the 3rd grade but it was my ass, not my dick. (She said I had a smart mouth.) (Is that the same thing as a deep throat? She may have had a point...)

[Guest jeejer]

Right on AArronn or what ever your name is.

 

I think that your choice of professional names shows much about your clever mind and wit. Probably more then your "real" name. Or is Aarronn your "real" name.

 

Hope you had a great day today