Jump to content

Is old school porn better?


socurious
This topic is 1357 days old and is no longer open for new replies.  Replies are automatically disabled after two years of inactivity.  Please create a new topic instead of posting here.  

Recommended Posts

I just turned 37 and feel like gay porn from 2000's (early and mid 2000's especially) was better compared to the one we see today. Not sure if the fact that I was discovering my sexuality back then plays a role, or perhaps I'm also getting this impression because the movies were just less accessible in those years? Thoughts please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also 37. Men's grooming and body styles change with time. Look at the mustaches and perms from the 70s porn! Today, porn stars are covered in tattoos which are mostly not attractive to me. I definitely dig the grooming and body styles from the 2000s. There's other aspects, too; like directing styles and what makes money differently as technology changes. But I'm more turned on by the body types and grooming styles predominant in the 00's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's good about porn from the late 1980s and early 1990s for me: Generally clean shaven and no tattoos and a lot of good looking men. What's bad: Most sex seems scripted/highly directed.

 

What's good about porn today, particularly if we are talking about performer released porn on Fan websites: More passion/genuine sexual chemistry. What's bad: Production values (not always, but sometimes bad lighting and camera angles); too many tattoos; since everyone can make porn if he wants, there are a lot more performers who look downright unattractive as far as I am concerned.

 

I don't think I have any specific porn memories of the early 2000s, but I'd say it had a lot more in common with the 1980s than today.

 

If forced to choose an era, I would definitely choose more recent porn because at least I can find a lot of hot scenes after I weed out the guys who look ugly to me. A lot of old porn is just boring. I can just imagine being a hot guy paired with another hot guy but then some unattractive director is interrupting the sex repeatedly to adjust positions, camera angles, etc. That completely ruins the flow of porn most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just turned 37 and feel like gay porn from 2000's (early and mid 2000's especially) was better compared to the one we see today. Not sure if the fact that I was discovering my sexuality back then plays a role, or perhaps I'm also getting this impression because the movies were just less accessible in those years? Thoughts please.

 

The only thing I don't like about porno now is so many guys inked.

 

Fortunately there's more diversity now in porno. In the 90's and 2000's all the guys were jocks with a perfectly waxed butt and tanning line. Not that I don't like guys who look lime models but now we have otters, cubs, hipsters, daddys, twinks, guys next door, geeks and makes it more fun at least to me...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also 37. Men's grooming and body styles change with time. Look at the mustaches and perms from the 70s porn! Today, porn stars are covered in tattoos which are mostly not attractive to me. I definitely dig the grooming and body styles from the 2000s. There's other aspects, too; like directing styles and what makes money differently as technology changes. But I'm more turned on by the body types and grooming styles predominant in the 00's.

 

What do you think is the difference between the body types and grooming styles from the early and mid 2000's compared to today? I would like you to highlight this as I don't have a clear idea in my mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I don't like about porno now is so many guys inked.

 

Fortunately there's more diversity now in porno. In the 90's and 2000's all the guys were jocks with a perfectly waxed butt and tanning line. Not that I don't like guys who look lime models but now we have otters, cubs, hipsters, daddys, twinks, guys next door, geeks and makes it more fun at least to me...

 

Maybe I just happen to like more the porn stars from the 2000's and not so much the ones from today?

 

Ryan Bones, William Seed, Rogan Richards... umm those are the only ones that come to my mind now from this era.

Edited by nycboi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I just happen to like more the porn stars from the 2000's and not so much the ones from today?

 

Ryan Rose, William Seed, Rogan Richards... umm those are the only ones that come to my mind now from this era.

 

Exactly porno beauty was more traditional stardom in porno has been redefined. A beard was unthinkable, otters inexistent or waxed. I think Raging Stallion and also Titanmen started changing it. The Falcon look as it was called back then might still reign but doesn't dominate.

 

Btw I love onlyfans.com not that I don't appreciate a good scene with a sexy plot.

 

The Falcon look

 

 

 

71izXSDA2fL._SL1132_.jpg

Edited by marylander1940
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I see all sides. As some one who came of age in the 80s there have certainly been many changes over the years. I've always had a thing for vintage porn (like 60s and 70s). I agree that it's fun to have so much variety and so many niches catered to today. I personally don't mind tattoos so much unless they're facial. For me a handsome/cute face is one of the most important things. I also appreciate that you can create a high resolution video with very basic equipment these days. Webcams and cellphones have made it so easy for everyone to broadcast or record themselves

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@nycboi Marcus Iron was considered exotic because of refusing to wax his chest.

 

 

71VEjrdxhfL._SL1132_.jpg

 

 

2001???

 

I watched gay porn for the first time in like 2002. There was this XXX channel showing a movie once a week. It was so damn hot...

 

When I came to America I used to watch porn at the peeps shows near Times Square. I wasted a lot of money back then. There was also a lot of guys waiting to hook up at those places but I was never aware of it until someone told me, lol (I was so socially awkward back then).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like them both. I consider old school porn the 1980s era. Like Kevin Williams, Chad Douglas, Jeff Stryker. They had the best tan line asses. But I like the raunchiness of new porn. I can’t remember ever seeing a guy cum in the mouth of another guy in a 1980s porno. But now it’s common. And Marylander is right, porn now is a lot less homogeneous. More races are also represented. In the 1980s all the gay porn stars looked like frat guys/jocks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gee willakers, kids! My first exposure to gay porn was in a theatre in SFO in the late 70’s. The acting was non-existent, the lighting and photography (16mm) pretty poor, and the men were every kind- twink to jock to daddy. The action ranged from boring meh to crazy hot, and featured a lot of outdoor action shot on Fire Island. It was the sex education film I needed to come out. I converted a rented VHS copy of it years later into digital and still have it... Its real appeal is from the associated memory of the rush of it being my first time with all of it, and the cruisy setting of where I saw it. The stuff from that time and early 80’s was all grittier, and it became more scripted, staged and polished as videotape provided more detail, better color and lengthier format. The men became smoother, prettier, but often less engaged in the scene, with wider use of stunt dicks for closeups, as this was all pre- Viagra.

Gay-for-Pay is, I think, the worst thing about porn from the 90’s on. I still watch some old-school (70-80’s) scenes that make me explode like I was young again. That said, these days I love seeing 1080p capturing talent like Nate Grimes and Sherman Maus...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like them both. I consider old school porn the 1980s era. Like Kevin Williams, Chad Douglas, Jeff Stryker. They had the best tan line asses. But I like the raunchiness of new porn. I can’t remember ever seeing a guy cum in the mouth of another guy in a 1980s porno. But now it’s common. And Marylander is right, porn now is a lot less homogeneous. More races are also represented. In the 1980s all the gay porn stars looked like frat guys/jocks.

 

I think you’re right in the 70’s there were very few companies but they did everything.

 

Facials and rimming in the 80s and 90s and even early 2000s was highly unusual and I don’t recall seeing it in Falcon, Catalina and other main stream companies. First time I saw cum eating was on Sean Cody and Corbin Fisher. When Bel Ami started doing it we even talked about it on here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly porno beauty was more traditional stardom in porno has been redefined. A beard was unthinkable, otters inexistent or waxed. I think Raging Stallion and also Titanmen started changing it. The Falcon look as it was called back then might still reign but doesn't dominate.

 

Btw I love onlyfans.com not that I don't appreciate a good scene with a sexy plot.

 

The Falcon look

 

Back then Jeff Stryker, Ryan Idol, Joey Stefano were visible in gay off Broadway shows and gay bars. I don't remember seeing Mike Jensen, but other people did.

 

But I did see Billy Brandt up close.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Old school....wow I'd thought I never see the day 2000 is considered old school...but I love all of it. Each decade has a fad to it. The hairstyles, the slang, the clothing, the bareback of the 70's and early 80s to condom in the 90's and early 2000s then back to bareback today. Back in the day you had big names that everyone knew, today anyone and everyone makes porn. I watch a lot of amateurs nowadays because it's more realistic to me. If I can't be convinced that what I'm seeing isn't real I'm not interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...