Why "a well-reviewed escort"????

[12is12]

Yesterday a post here reported a story about an escort who showed up for a BFE and provided no intimacy. The author used this phrase rather than the excort's nick, and one of the reponders invited a PM in order to check whether they were conned by the same guy.

 

Can't understand this!

Why are you keeping secrets?

Please share nicks, so we'll know whom to avoid!!

 

The aim of this forum is to share not only complimentary referrals but also warnings.

Do both gentelmen want others to go through they same ordeal, allowing this dishonest escort to continue swindling?

Enough with the over-consideration and PC carefulenss!

By taking pity on the bad guys, you're punishing the good guys.

[12is12]

Minutes after posting the above, I chanced upon this (in another thread):

"This assumes MuscleVIP can stay hard. He had issues when I saw him and blamed his overnight client. It was really disappointing. "

 

Helpful non-anonymity here. Now prospective clients know they should make sure beforehand with said escort that such non-performance won't recur.