wiltshirede

Photoshop is strongly indicated in a large number of his recent photos. Nevertheless, this is nothing severe - he is using the tool to make himself look less stocky.

No, although fabrication seems to be indicated in some of his reviews, which contain identical punctuation errors. There might be a mixture of real and unreal, or he may have a person (Client?) who writes them for him using a VPN, $15 accounts and emails. Fabricated feedback isn't necessarily evidence of a bad provider.

Sleepyboy are aware of this, and keeping an eye on the advertiser. I am not sure how the old account (/yolowood) disappeared. Maybe it was a ban, since he wouldn't just delete an account with 10 "reviews" if you have to pay £10 to fake each one.

All I know is that in 2017/18?, the same advertiser had another account with similar reviews (glaring positive, identical prose, unrealistic frequency, typographical similarities) and he conned a client for a lot of money - £200/300? deposit. This account mentioned both Bristol and Bromley (London). The advertiser was selling a personal collection of videos for £50 in which he was topping twinks, and trying to initiate contact with prospective clients in some way by doing this. The account was linked to "Matthew Black". Any search for who this might actually be - runs dry.

He took the deposit from the client, the arrangement fell through and he then sent mocking messages after he asked for the money back. I have no reason to doubt the client. He was regular, known for years, took me out a few evenings and nights when I was doing that kind of thing, and quite pragmatic about the way he was conned by the advertiser. My recommendation is only engage this advertiser if you are visiting his premises. He will otherwise ask for advances. His feeback also has fabrication indicated, both on his present and deleted profiles. Sleepyboy only accepts reviews from paid client accounts*, so high frequency feedback written in a very similar style is likely the advertiser himself using a £10 burner account to submit one. *Since all features bar a few photos are free, I know few clients who ever paid for an account on Sleepyboy.

Further, Mr Black's operation has more often centered around selling videos of himself involved with "younger men" of ambiguous age. He is very much into twinks.

Henry (Matt Black) is a deposit scammer. Stole £300 from one of my clients.

I have been informed in the past that Matt Black is a conman who operates a deposit scam, so proceed with caution and don't send any money. And to be clear... Matt Black is "Henry" and not "Matt".

Comes across as a lunatic and a tryhard. Also, (very) basic analysis of his reviews reveals them to have been written by himself.

He advertised on RM when he was based in London.

If 80% is fabrication, indeed, 20% may be real. The reviews came in quick succession, because like most fake reviews on RentMen, they were written at a point in time to fulfill a present purpose. See for example, three reviews (all on on Feb 1!), some by previous reviewers. No narrative, just fabricated for a purpose. His narrative reviews are nearly all written by the same person, with the same errors. There are numerous accounts on RM, writing very similar narrative and blank reviews for the same itinerant South American escorts, often multiple times for the same provider. Your criteria for selecting escorts is bizarre - as if they are some kind of product that is pure and gets "used". And taking it at face value, using a review count is an incredibly naive way of measuring how much "contact" they have with the "outside world" (it sounds insane to even entertain something so inane).

It's to stop them posting reviews or reporting him - what even genuine escorts do when they have a bad experience on RM. Look at his reviews! Usual army of fakes, and one real client who whines about "being left in suspense" (he's on drugs) in his other reviews. No action on the fake escorts or their fake reviewers. They are really taking a chance with the Dutch advertising codes.

I don't see what there is to be confused about. He has been around for years with the same false advertising as already discussed, so it can be assumed to a 95% degree of certainty that it he has some resemblance to the model, but is more an average body type and perhaps older. I'm confused why clients repeatedly take the risk. Is it some kind of yearning for last century?

> https://www.sleepyboy.com/uk/london/escort/alon

Daniel Velascos is the one on that list I recognise. Can be expensive but good - from a couple of client perspectives. Both of the clients who provided feedback were vanilla or massage clients.